Like pretty much everyone fortunate enough to occupy a faculty position in psychology at a research university, I am frequently asked to review articles submitted for publication to scientific journals. Editors rely heavily on these reviews in making their accept/reject decisions. I know: I’ve been an editor myself, and I experienced first-hand the frustrations in trying to persuade qualified reviewers to help me assess the articles that flowed over my desk in seemingly ever-increasing numbers.
Health Magazine
Why I Decline to Do Peer Reviews (part One): Re-reviews
Posted on the 04 February 2014 by Soumyadeepb
Author's Latest Articles
-
Justice: What is It, and What Are Its Types?
-
The State of Awareness, Usage, and Attitudes About Core Outcome Sets in India : Insights from Clinical Trialists and Systematic Reviewers
-
Book Review : The Foreign Gaze and the ‘triangle of People’ in Global Health.
-
On the Nature and Structure of Epistemic Injustice in the NTD Knowledge Ecosystem
