Eva G.: Brooke Shields and her mother Terri Shields.
Wow.
She barely posed nude in that movie though. I’ve seen that movie that everyone calls “child porn.” It’s all over the Internet and the anti-child porn freaks are all freaked out about and always demanding it be taken down. Except I believe already millions of men have seen that movie clip because it’s everywhere.
The thing about that clip is that there’s nothing there. She’s naked for less than five seconds, and you can’t see much of anything. Plus I don’t understand why everyone is freaked out. I looked at her naked 12 year old body and I thought, “Why would anyone get turned on by this?”
Almost 100% of idiot Americans think that photos of nude teenagers or children is child porn. Except they’re not. Nudity isn’t necessarily child porn. You can put up all the photos of naked kids you want. There are nudist sites all over the Net showing just that. And there are naked teenage girls all over the whole net too. If she’s naked, in order for it to be child porn, you need something like “lascivious display of the genitalia,” otherwise it’s not child porn.
The whole idea that we as adults are flipped out about naked kids or even naked teenagers is highly disturbing.
Let’s think for a moment about this. What is a naked child or teenager?
It is simply a human being, Homo sapiens, in its natural habitat, that is without any clothing.
We are saying that photos of naked human beings are somehow the ultimate in evil and that people who see pictures of naked human beings should have their balls cut off or should rot in prison and be raped there over and over until they die? Isn’t that a bizarre way to feel?
We are also saying that photos of naked kids and teenagers are so evil and lascivious (which means highly likely to turn you on) that they are virtually the ultimate in erotic stimulus. Whereas to most normal folks, they’re not. I’ve seen nudist photos of kids. I always think, “Why would anyone care about this? Why would anyone get turned on by this? This is nothing, it’s BS.”
And by allowing photos of naked adults but viciously proscribing those of naked kids, we are saying that photos of naked adults are far less lascivious and erotic than photos of children! What a bizarre thing to say! And it’s demonstrably untrue. Most normal humans are much more aroused by a naked adult than by a naked kid. In fact, naked kids are profoundly un-erotic in my opinion. They turn me on about as much as a toaster or a tree stump.
Isn’t that the ultimate in Puritanism though. We as a society are claiming that the ultimate in pornographic evil is naked human beings? That’s as bad as Victorians putting trousers on piano legs.
