Politics Magazine

Which Is Better for Racial Classification: Genes Or Skulls?

Posted on the 28 May 2015 by Calvinthedog

Matt writes:

So could this be an explanation for Kennewick Man? The Makah come from pretty nearby… Maybe he is an ancestor of current Native Americans after all?

Also, in your opinion are skulls and morphological traits more reliable for classification than genes? If so, why?

Kennewick Man’s skull lines up with the Australoid Ainu and the Moriori Polynesians who are Australoid-Paleomongoloid transitionals.

He came across the Bering Straight. The early Indians were Australoid types. I keep telling you guys that early Asians were Australoids! See, this guy came from NE Asia and he was very Australoid.

Sure, they are much more explanatory. The Negritos of Thailand have genes that look Thai. The Negritos of the Philippines have genes that look Filipino. Do you think those people are Thais and Filipinos? I think their race is Negrito Australoid.

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog