Cisco writes:
If a “straight guy’s” cock can get hard for a guy, he’s bisexual. Simple as that. I guess I’ll never find out if I’m bisexual though because I have no plans to be naked with another man ever.
If a guy’s cock can get hard for a cored-out melon, then that means that melons turn him on and his sexual orientation is Melonfucker? That doesn’t make sense because men will screw anything. They don’t even have to get turned on by something to fuck it. Where there’s a hole, there’s a way. A pole wants a hole and could care less what it’s attached to.
That’s nutty. Up to 95% of the male population is capable of having sex with men. Look at ancient societies where this sort of thing was rife. All of those men were bisexual? I doubt it.
Sexual orientation refers to what turns you on. It goes like this:
100-0: Maximum heterosexual, minimum homosexual
90-10: Maximum heterosexual, incidental homosexual
80-20: Maximum heterosexual, significant homosexual
70-30: Maximum heterosexual, strong homosexual
60-40: Maximum heterosexual, very strong strong homosexual
50-50: Maximum heterosexual, maximal homosexual
40-60: Maximum homosexual, very strong heterosexual
30-70: Maximum homosexual, strong heterosexual
20-80: Maximum homosexual, significant heterosexual
10-90: Maximum homosexual, incidental heterosexual
0-100: Maximum homosexual, minimal heterosexual
The only people who are bisexual are those who identify as bisexual. 40-60 t0 60-40 is pure bisexual. Some 70-30’s and 30-70’s will identify that way.
Most people from 0-100 to 20-80 will identify as gay, and most people from 100-0 to 80-20 will identify as straight. Sexual orientation refers to what turns you on, not your actual behavior.
Sexual behavior is independent and in some cases may be completely different from sexual orientation.
I know some straight women who have had sex with women. A couple of them did it twice, but another one did it a dozen times. They all decided that they didn’t like it, and they were strictly dickly. On what grounds could they possibly be considered bisexual? Makes no sense.
However, some people do lie about their orientation. This is a big problem with men. A number of gay men simply lie and say they are bisexual. We used to test them in the lab. A number of studies were done in the lab where “bisexual” men tested:
- maximum homosexual
- minimum heterosexual
Gay men test exactly the same. They test:
- maximum homosexual
- minimum heterosexual
Straight men typically test like this in the lab:
- maximum heterosexual
- minimum homosexual
As you can see, even gay men often have some minimal response to females and even straight men often have some minimal response to males. So orientations are continua of spectra of somewhat gray areas instead of hard and fast, black and white, Manichean categories.
As a result of these tests, sexologists were beginning to question whether male bisexuality even existed or whether most of it was simply gay men who due to societal pressures simply did not want to fess up to their homosexuality and instead sought refuse in the somewhat more socially acceptable bisexual category. The standard line in the field was, “There’s no such thing as a bisexual man.”
However recently we managed to find a group of men who said they were bisexual and tested like this:
- maximum heterosexual
- maximal homosexual
Or something along those lines. Researchers concluded that on the basis of this study, it does look like there is a group of men who can be properly called bisexuals.
