Let us look at the Alpha – Beta – Omega spectrum. Feminists and leftwingers all insist that this spectrum is pseudo-scientific nonsense, but I assure you that this theory is on solid grounds. Humans are competitive and hierarchical, and there is not much we can do about it.
There are two ways of looking at them, hierarchical and behavioral.
Heirarchical or Statistical
Society is divided into Alphas (15-20%), Betas (60-70%) and Omegas (15-20%). People seem to be able to move around in these categories but these percentages will always stay the same in any society. Y
You can never have a society of 100% Alphas, and you probably can’t have one of 100% Omegas. Women will probably always slice off the top men and monopolize them with sexual attention and priority, and they will probably always lock out the bottom men no matter how these men behave, if only because they are on the bottom. The Betas in the middle will be treated variously by women depending on the society.
Let us say you had a theoretical society where all of the men acted Alpha. An average woman would be approached by easily 10+ very high value men every single day. What’s a girl to do? Go out with all of them? Have a gangbang every day? Not going to happen.
Women being heirarchical-minded creatures, when faced with a society where 100% of the men acted Alpha, women would probably cream off the top 20% of the Alphas (the Super-Alphas) and shower them with sex and attention.
Women would probably slice off the bottom 15% of the Alphas (the Lesser Alphas who are nevertheless quite Alpha in behavior) and ignore or mistreat them as failures and rejects.
And women would probably put the remaining 60-70% of the Alphas (the Ordinary Alphas) into some sort of a Beta category and treat them however Beta men get treated in that society.
It’s probably always going to be this way no matter how men act. Women will always look for the top 20% of the men, slice them off from the rest, designate them Alphas and reward them with sex and attention. Why? Because of this quote:
“Women always want the best.”
-Oscar Wilde
That’s why. Think about it, and you might just agree with me.
The 20-60-20 rule will probably be static in most any society because otherwise you would end up with situations like on the PUA blogs where you have 80% of the retarded men all claiming to be Alphas – in other words, on PUA sites, 80-100% of the men all insist that they are in the top 20%. Can someone explain to me how 80-100% of the men can be in the top 20%?
It would be like Lake Wobegon where everyone is above average. It’s not happening. The insanity of the PUA fraudsters and con artists is that they insist that 100% of men can be in the top 15-20%! Tell me how that is supposed to work.
A Game site called Return of Kings which is full of PUA con artists linked to my critique along these lines, beat around the bush and refused to answer the question just like con artists always do. Nevertheless, the point remains. There are only so many spaces at the top. No more than 15% of the men can be in the top 15%. Think about it! Real hard!
Please do not ever call yourself an Alpha whether you are one or now. It’s gauche, crude, rude and very un-Alpha to ever refer to oneself as an Alpha. Let other people do that for you. Whether you are in the top 15% or not is frankly for others to decide and not you.
You can run around like an idiot screaming, “I am an Alpha!” like these clowns on PUA sites, and it won’t necessarily make you one. It is as if saying you are rich would suddenly mean you can buy a mansion. Your opinion of yourself is irrelevant. Where you end up on that spectrum is for others, particularly women, to decide, not you.
Behaviorial
The other way of looking at Alpha – Beta – Omega is behavioral. In this sense, there is Alpha behavior, Beta behavior and Omega behavior.
We all know what Alpha behavior is. The Game sites have gone over it endlessly. There are many definitions of it but I am sure most of you get the picture.
We also have a pretty good idea of what Beta behavior is from multiple descriptions on Game sites.
And Omega behavior where no woman is attracted to you can also be easily envisioned.
I would argue that although no more than 15% of men can actually be Alphas, nevertheless, it is perfectly possible to have societies where all men act Alpha, or act Beta or act Omega for that matter. How men behave can be divided up in all sorts of ways, and it has no limits other than 0-100% (think about it).
In this case, I would argue that most men would probably do better with women if they acted more Alpha. If you want to know what acting Alpha is, go to the Game sites and read up. If you are not acting Alpha now, and if you start incorporating more Alpha behaviors into your personality, you may indeed find that you are doing better with women. I find that I do better with men too when I deliberately try to be Alpha.
