Hair & Beauty Magazine

Thoughtful Thursday: The Obsession with Post-Editing

By Kittyfairy @KittyFairy
Thoughtful Thursday: The Obsession with Post-Editing
Since it's Thoughtful Thursday, I've decided to talk about a topic that has been bugging me for a long time. It's a topic that opens up a can of worms pretty much every single day, because it's an area that the marketing industry, not only in the area of beauty, seems to be so obsessed with. And it's one part of marketing that I absolutely detest:
Thoughtful Thursday: The Obsession with Post-Editing
You know what I mean, right? Those adverts for shampoo, mascara, foundation etc because the list in virtually eternal, which feature naturally beautiful women, promoting these products and yet the marketing department feels this underlying need to edit the images so that the person is virtually unrecognisable.
When I first saw this first picture, in a magazine, a few years back, I remember not having a clue who it was. I had a slight inkling that I recognised the face, but I couldn't quite place it. This is, sadly, not uncommon, and I've found myself several times being forced to check the small print on the side of the page, in the vain hope that it will tell me who exactly the person in the image is.
By now, you've probably seen the image before, and the adverts that came with it, so you'll probably already know who this is:
Thoughtful Thursday: The Obsession with Post-Editing
For anyone who isn't sure, it's Davina McCall. It seems ridiculous to think how unrecognisable this is, especially when, at the time that I saw this advert, I was a huge fan of Big Brother, so Davina was quite literally on my Telly Box several times a week, and I knew exactly what she looked like. So, how did I not recognize her?
Another more recent photoshopping-gone-too-far, set Twitter ablaze with fury, because it was yet again, a classic case of being told who it was, and having to just believe them, because the image that we'd been provided just didn't look like the person it was claimed to be:
Thoughtful Thursday: The Obsession with Post-Editing
"Apparently" this is Zooey Deschanel. But, honestly, if I was the quirky and natural beautiful Deschanel, I would NOT be happy for this to be slapped across billboards and magazine pages across the planet. Why? Because it doesn't look like (the hypothetical) me!
Another recent irritation of photoshopping, has been the most recent poster, for the upcoming Hunger Games film. I've cropped the image, to only feature the part that I want to emphasise, purely because otherwise this image would have been far too big, and it's still quite sizeable!
Thoughtful Thursday: The Obsession with Post-Editing
This image of Jennifer Lawrence, playing Katniss Everdeen, irritates me because the photoshopping to make her skin look "perfect" just goes against absolutely everything that the character is about. I know that in the books, her skin is made to look perfect after certain events, to make her skin look perfect for The Capitol, but that's not what her character is all about. Is Hollywood too scared to put an actress on a poster that isn't "picture perfect"?
Ultimately, it's unrealistic. However, it also reminded me of a photograph that I took of myself around seven years ago. I'm not really sure what I was doing, entirely, but I remember being sat at my desk, and I decided to play around with a small desk lamp that I had in front of me (I think that I was bored!!), and I took one photo with the light shining right on. Seriously, just one. And when I uploaded that image to my PC, I was actually amazed at the image and how it looked incredible, and yet not me at all.
Thoughtful Thursday: The Obsession with Post-Editing
Honestly, this is really me. And it was taken using only a desk lamp (no natural lighting), and a Samsung Camera Phone. So, not even a Camera. I can't remember the model of the phone, but it was probably Circa 2005/2006! And most importantly, the image has not been edited.
I've had people, including family members, tell me that it's not me, but I can assure you that it really, 100% and completely definitely is me! But, I can understand why they think it isn't, purely because the image makes my lips and eyes look bigger. However, with the lips I think that's helped by the lipgloss that I was wearing. And with the eyes, the fact that I'm looking up was probably a big (hoho!) help, alongside the eye makeup (which is impressive, since I was terrible at applying eye makeup back then!).
It got me thinking though. If I can make myself look okay (and I'm genuinely not very photogenic), including hiding the fact that I had really bad skin, then why can't professional photographers? Okay, so I know that it's defeating the point, and going against the whole looking natural thing, but surely this is more "moral" at least than completely faking it.
It's like makeup, in that we use it to amplify what we have. So, why not using lighting to amplify what we have, instead of using software to create what someone else would like us to have?
Have you ever played around with angles and lighting? Indeed, have you ever photoshopped yourself?What is your opinion on using lighting and angles to make yourself look better? As bad as photoshopping, or just amplifying what you have?

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog