Beatrix wrote:
So in the state of Louisiana & in Mexico one is assumed guilty until proven innocent – does that mean they’re under female rule?
Did women put guilty until proven innocent laws into place in Louisiana and Mexico? I don’t think so. Then it’s not female rule. It’s only Female Rule when gender feminist women specifically put guilty until proven innocent laws into place in order to privilege women and oppress men.
Those laws were put into place in the US by women who were gender feminists. Gender feminist women anywhere on Earth at any time will always put laws like guilty until proven laws into place because that’s how women think. Female Rule doesn’t work. There’s two kinds of women:
1. Real women
2. Gender feminists
I strongly support females in government in a sense; that is, I do not oppose it in principle.
Women can be lawmakers and even rule in a (a female president is not per se a bad idea) as long as they are not gender feminists. Many nations have or had female presidents. They did a great job because those woman presidents were not gender feminists.
There have been plenty of great female leaders of nations, and many great females have served positions of high power. As long as they are not gender feminists, there is no problem.
Benazir Bhutto, Indira Gandhi, Corey Aquino, Angela Merkel, Christina Kirchner, Bachelet in Chile, Dilma Rouseff, the list is very long. Even Margaret Thatcher did not rule as a gender feminist.
There have also been woman presidents in Dominica, the Scandinavian countries, Japan, and other countries that now elude my memory.
None of these women imposed Female Rule on any of these nations.
Female Rule: Rule of society by and via the ideals, rules and laws of gender feminism.
The problem isn’t women in power.
It’s gender feminist women in power.
