Sure in a lot of cases it is the other way around, but we can’t always say that the Whiter men create civilization while the darker men destroy civilization. In the case of India at least, things were completely reversed.
Sure “The White man creates, the Dark men destroy” is racist, but that’s not why it’s wrong. If a racist statement is true then it’s true, period. Sure, there are pragmatic reasons to not flaunt racial truths about because you will make the insulted races angry, the insulting races proud and haughty, and really nothing will be accomplished anyway.
But it looks like “The White man create, the Dark man destroys” isn’t even true! Now if a racist statement is not true, then no sensible person should bandy it about. Not only are you insulting The Insulted and the Injured, but you are insulting them based on a great big fat lie! That’s just wrong. It’s not even mean. It’s beyond that and into evil. Don’t persecute people based on lies. That’s what bad people do.
Below, Judith Mirville takes apart the myth of the Great Aryan Civilization better than I could. A lot of people still believe this. David Duke went to India and looked at all of the “great Aryan temples” and then wrote article lamenting how Great White India was ruined by race-mixing with dark inferiors. Like I said above, that’s not only mean, but it’s also just wrong.
What you say just doesn’t work for India. Mohenjo Daro and Harappa were inhabited by rather dark and miscegenated people, at least by looking at their sculpture, and these two cities were marvelously functional in all respects. The White Aryans came from the North and everything crumbled exactly in the same way when now Nigerians or Pakis are invading neighborhoods in London, but with the colors reversed: most historians now think that the Aryan invasion was gradual and more like an immigration of poor cattle-raising people from the North apart from a few violent uprisings of Whites as the one that terminated with Harappa.
The same thing repeated later on at various times in Indian history: one of the most prosperous times in more recent Indian history was the Shaivite Renaissance, it was marked by the return to preeminence of various darker people and of free race-mixing in the cities through the loosening of the caste system.
The Moghol empires, on the other hand, were clearly a White man’s revenge in the name of Islam, and in the same time the Vaishnava Indian religion, a very White racist one in the Jim Crow fashion, prevailed in the Hindu area proper: that was the time of gradual impoverishment and also of religious ideas condemning all forms of technical invention and social ascension. Very whites areas in Northern India that have refused all forms of race-mixing are by no means remnants of a former more prosperous India, quite the contrary, they are the ones who wash the less and shit the most in the open.
The relatively optimistic and modernistic part of India is Tamil India, there only things get going and structures are being built and well maintained, both the ancient temples which are painted of vivid colors as in the ancient times year after year (even though I find them very ugly) and the Victorian and more modern buildings which all look brand new, contrary to other zones where they already look old and derelict just the year after their construction.
It is in the clearer areas of Norther India that you find most ancient cities present-day people can no longer maintain and fill up with hovels, as well as remnants of the British Raj that look like ruins of antiquity. This is attested by the Aryan sacred texts themselves where the construction of sophisticated buildings is seen as the dark enemy’s handiwork.
I understand your concern about the White race’s future but the model you claim of just doesn’t work for India : in India the Darkest are generally the Creative, the makers, while the Whitest are traditionally the destroyers, the takers, and also, on a more idealistic plane, those who call most loudly to a return to nature. White intellectuals in India tend to engage in religion (whatever it may be, Islam, yoga…) whereas darkies are fond of technology and of the practical aspect of science quite in the South-Eastern Asian way.
