Robert I don’t think I’ve ever heard Roosh say he does anything like that guy you mentioned. He has a number of books out about how he seduces women. It’s pretty much just game and logistics.
I’ve never read any of those books because I always thought that stuff was disgusting. I don’t even read about or use other people’s pickup lines. It seems cheap, sleazy and lame. Of course I use lines or pickup lines if you want to call them that, but I prefer to make up my own.
This brilliant invention these idiots claimed they just discovered in the last 5-10 years called Game is nothing new. There were books out in the 1970’s called How to Pick Up Girls. By watching my friends and learning by observation and being sharp, I now realize that we had already perfected a 1970’s version of Game that looks a whole lot like this “new” one.
This stuff has been around forever. There’s a Latin classic called On Love. Maybe Cicero wrote it. He should have titled it, How to Pick Up Girls in Rome in the Yeah 200 BC. Because that is exactly what that book is about. And the things that Roman guy is saying are quite similar to the stuff I was learning on my own in the 1970’s, and both look a lot like these characters and their “brand new invention” called Game.
I do read Roissy and some of the other scumbags sometimes when I am not feeling too nauseous, and I have a barf bag handy in case I have to retch. Sadly, those guys are dishing out some very disappointingly true lessons. Their lessons suck because people suck. Women suck. Men suck. Society sucks. Jerkoffs clean up and nice guys finish last. It’s all true, and it is valuable to learn this sleaze. Why? Because, trust me, it comes in handy, as I use these lessons all the time, but by God it is so depressing and cynical.
And of course I use my own version of Game and have for many, many years now, ever since I was a teenage boy. And I have been perfecting it all along, too.
Face it. Seduction is a scam. It’s a game, a con, a ruse, a trick, a spell. At best, you are casting a spell on her. At worst, you are pulling a sneaky con on her while you scam the Hell out of her. But hey, that’s the game. If you don’t have this attitude towards seduction, I do not think you will do well.
If women don’t like it, they need to learn Game Countermeasures to counteract men’s seduction scamming. Or learn how to scam, con, trick, and cast spells on us men. Which of course they do all the time to us anyway. Even in the midst of the wildest, most crazy, head over heels passionate love affair, both parties are trying to get their ends meet any way they can. Which tends to involve a lot of scamming, tricking and fooling people.
I must say though that I so hate the way these idiots have made up a whole series of sports-like plays and moves to describe the various steps in the seduction process. These clowns are going about seducing women as if they were at a chess tournament! I forget the various terminology they use, but they had some stupid sports-like word to describe every aspect of their seduction tennis.
Yeah it’s tennis, but so are conversations. And conversations and seduction both work only because we don’t treat them like drill sets or football scribbages.
The woman would do various things and these would be described as shields or blocks or words like that. Then he would do other things like wash or wave or reorder to whatever to try to remove the shields or blocks.
I am serious, they were going about it like it was a game of chess! She moved her knight and took my rock, and then I checked her queen! She agreed to go home with me! Checkmate!
Fuck that.
And when they finally get to the point where they got her into bed, I think they call that a “close.”
Yeah.
A “close.”
Two human beings are about ready to have sex and you call it a close.
That is just awful. Now keep in mind this is coming from a guy who girlfriends accuse of being unempathetic, “the worst man on Earth” and such, and these guys even seem like scumbags to me.
They are treating the dance of seduction like a tennis, boxing, ping-pong or even chess match.
You finally get her into bed, and you have the nerve to call that a close?
You know what?
Fuck you.
I cannot describe how appalled I was when I read these guys run through their insane rugby match play-by-plays about they seduced this, well, let’s be real here – object – because she’s not really a human, now is she? She’s about as human as that tennis racket in your hand or that rook you just took his bishop with.
Guess what clowns? You are a human beings. I know that is very hard to comprehend given the appalling way you act, but science tells us that you guys are actually human, no matter how disgusting that may sound to the rest of us.
And guess what? That thing, that object, that red queen or ping pong racket or whatever it is that you just closed your stupid choreographed match with? She, too, is a human being. But when these men run through these seduction play-by- play scripts that read like lines of computer code
if x, then y,
in doing so, they are not treating her like she is a woman. Hell, they are not even treating her like she is a human.
And this is coming from a man who is routinely called an anti-feminist, who ends up on MRA and anti-feminist lists all over the Internet, and who despises the aspect of feminism that rants on and on about women being treated as sex objects or objects or women’s objectification or whatever when what they are talking about is mating displays among human mammals looking for sex.
I hate it when feminists say “that reduces women to a sex object.”
But these guys…yeah…they are reducing women to objects, or worse. A sex object sounds like it’s alive.
They way these guys treat these women, it’s like they are trying to seduce an Android, not a human being.
Color me Beyond Disgusted.
