Here.
The article is not about me at all, instead it is about something else entirely. The subject is a 14 year old boy who writes that he wants to go to Dartmouth University, but he is worried that it is full of a bunch of sluts as so many colleges are these days. He is a traditional and conservative guy, and he’s looking for a nice girl who shares his morals. He worries he won’t fight one at your typical Slut U.
Here is his comment below. He made similar comments at eight other university boards.
Traditional man inquires about various Slut U’s to determine the % of sluts at any given university. Slut majority U’s are out of the question, but if the dirty whores are only a minority, he could abide by their loose morals and let it slide.
I don’t share this fellow’s degree of rectory, but I have nothing against people with high morals who wish to save themselves for marriage or whatever and then harbor conservative sexual morals after marriage. There’s nothing evil about celibacy, virginity or chastity. One of the worst things that the Cultural Revolution of the 60′s did was to make chastity into a sin. Since when is chastity as sin or a sign of failure as a human being anyway? Sluts and players perch on the top of the moral pyramid while the chaste and true wallow in Hellish boiling mud below? Give me a break, talk about inversions. We have truly turned morality upside down and made morals of sins and sinners of the good.
And it’s pretty much true that the way I lived my life, while I am proud of it, isn’t exactly optimal for society. In fact, a lot of society’s problems are due to too many people living like I did and not enough people showing some degree of moral probity.
Needless to say, the gender feminists and male feminists piled all over the poor sod. Male feminists are otherwise known as “pussies,” and a prominent male feminist, a big fat dorky pussy looking guy, runs the blog Manboobz, from which he mocks the Manosphere. The general reaction is that a decent boy’s desire not to attend some variety of Slut U. is an example of sexism and misogyny. But everything is misogyny to a feminist. There are more misogynists than there are grains of sand on a beach according to feminists.
One of the commenters in the piece, ShiOres, starts the attack on me here.
Sorry for the derail, but does anyone here know the blog of self-confessed “liberal” racist race-realist Robert Lindsay? Some time ago he also wrote about sluts and the double-standard which was super-misogynist (the particular irony is, that he always claims to be different than “those women-hating MRAs”) but gives a nice outline of all the hypocritical thinking.
Proceed at own risk
She calls me a racist, as all these liberal/Left loons do, then she calls me a super misogynist, as all feminists do. I am neither a racist nor a misogynist, but I have my own definitions about those terms other than Identity Politics daffynitions. It’s true I do not like most MRA’s because their off the charts misogyny simply makes me sick.
You can follow the thread down a ways to see all of the silly comments that are directed at me. You can’t win with these bitches. Seriously.
You might also want to check out the piece of mine that they linked to that set them all into mass PMS: Double Standards for Men and Women? It provoked some pretty wild discussion when it was first posted.
