A transparent and evidence-based priority-setting process promotes the optimal use of resources to improve health outcomes. Decision-makers and funders have begun to increasingly engage representatives of patients and healthcare consumers to ensure that research becomes more relevant. However, disadvantaged groups and their needs may not be integrated into the priority-setting process since they do not have a “political voice” or are unable to organize into interest groups. Equitable priority-setting methods need to balance patient needs, values, experiences with population-level issues and issues related to the health system.
Read the full paper published by Dr. Soumyadeep B et al at Indian Journal of Medical Ethics here (Click: Open Access)
Health Magazine
Ethics and Equity in Research Priority-setting: Stakeholder Engagement and the Needs of Disadvantaged Groups
Posted on the 17 March 2015 by SoumyadeepbAuthor's Latest Articles
-
Justice: What is It, and What Are Its Types?
-
The State of Awareness, Usage, and Attitudes About Core Outcome Sets in India : Insights from Clinical Trialists and Systematic Reviewers
-
Book Review : The Foreign Gaze and the ‘triangle of People’ in Global Health.
-
On the Nature and Structure of Epistemic Injustice in the NTD Knowledge Ecosystem
