Sam writes:
I think that with the computer breaking down offense it’s also breaking down communication control Now a broke guy like Robert, no offense meant :), can get a world wide platform to talk about what ever he damn well pleases. He doesn’t have to buy a huge printing press and hire newsboys, etc.
This is REALLY bad for the Jews because they suck. They have caused all kinds of havoc all across the planet for a long time and only their control of information has kept them safe. Even then people rebelled from time to time and they had to move on. This time it’s different. They’re playing for the whole ball of wax. Everything. If you could get 25% of the people in the advanced world to believe a 1/4 of what I believe their whole stick would be lost for at least 200 or 300 years and maybe forever.
So after all this now I ask,” What would you do if you were a psychopath and you were facing these challenges?”. The answers are all scary.
I am not going to deal with the Jews part here because I do not necessarily believe it. However, I will say that the Jews (among others) are very frightened of the Internet.
I would say that the fact that I can “start up my own paper” in a sense that loads just as fast or faster than the pages of the big media outlets must be very frightening to the elites of the US – the corporations and the rich. The corporations and the rich have been controlling the US media for a very long time now. This is because in the US, the freedom of the press belongs to anyone who can afford to set up a newspaper, TV station or radio station. Due to various rules and economic facts, only rich people and corporations can set up radio stations, TV stations and newspapers in the US. It simply costs too much for regular folks to do so.
There is the additional problem of advertisers. Any US media outlet that attempts to be populist and democratic and oppose the agenda of the rich and the corporations in favor of a pro-people agenda will soon run into an advertiser boycott by the capitalists. The capitalists will say that your outlet is “anti-business,” and they will quit advertising in it. No ads, no media. Since all US media (even cable TV which promised us no ads when they sold us the cable TV bill of goods) needs high ad revenue to survive, an advertiser boycott of any US media outlet quickly sinks the outlet.
You can try to make with no ads like Pacifica and other stations do, but have you noticed how often Pacifica runs membership drives where they try to shake you down for donations? A nonprofit media outlet is not only small and broke, but they have to spend a lot of time begging their consumers for money.
Some rich people in the past had socialist leanings and set up leftwing papers in the US. In Chicago in the 1940’s, a very rich man named Marshall Fields set up a pro-labor, pro-people, anti-elite newspaper in Chicago. It was successful for some time. It got little ad revenue so it essentially ran at a loss and was just funded as a money-losing project by Fields. This is really the only way any progressive media outlet can work in the US.
However, the Net has changed all of that. I am now more or less on the same level as Fox, NBC, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, and CNN news networks. I am almost more accessible than they are because my page loads a lot faster. I am on the same level as many online newspapers, possibly better because past a certain point, you have to start paying for articles there, and here the content is all free.
This was actually one of the early visions of a pure Communist society. It was one where everyone could seek the full develop of their personality and vision in any way they chose. You could have one guy on every other street running off a broadsheet and distributing it to anyone who would read it. He would be on the same level as state media.
The Net has resulted in complete media democracy, and you know the elites really hate that. They have always controlled the media in the US, but finally there is a media that they cannot control! They tried to control the Net by taking away Net Neutrality, but we shot that one down.
So this is one media that the elites have completely lost control over. And the fact that my page is frankly on the same level as the online pages of Fox News, the New York Times and Time Magazine must not only be very disturbing to Big Media, but it is also an excellent expression of what I would call “pure Communism in action.”
You see, some Communism is not so bad after all!
