Rick Dyer Bigfoot kill – continuing story. The story about the supposed Bigfoot kill by Rick Dyer is ongoing. I really urge you to follow it over at Randy’s blog as he keeps up on it far better than I do. His commenters are horrific, but I happen to think that Randy himself is a great guy.
I spoke with Walter Shrum, who was one of nine people who were able to see the Bigfoot. However, I must note that Walter saw it inside the blue tarp like the rest of us did. However, he could see through the tarp somewhat. Walter feels that this definitely looked like a Bigfoot. He described it as a “hairy man” that was “very wide.” On the other hand, viewing it through the tarp, he was not able to see it all that well, and it is possible that he could have been looking at a prop.
I know Walter well and he is a deeply religious man, and honestly I do not think he lies. He tries to live a Godly life and that would go against his strong Christian values. Walter also told me that he would not be in on a hoax in any way, shape or form. He said that if Rick asked him to be part of a hoax or if he discovered this was a hoax, he would simply refuse to be a part of it because he doesn’t want to taint himself with that, and that sort of thing goes against his strong Christian morals. Anyway, I do not think Shrum is lying,and I do not think he is the lying type. That’s just my opinion. Yet he did not get a good look at the object and he could well have been looking at a prop in that tarp.
Shrum also stated that Rick Dyer is the nicest guy you have ever met, and Shrum thinks he is a great guy.
Of course many people say this on meeting Dyer, as he can be very charming and gregarious as these types are. We’ve known that since Cleckley, right? I mean, that’s a hallmark trait.
There is not much else to report about this purported Bigfoot kill except that Dyer is promising a press conference in February (Where have we heard that before) which will apparently be in Georgia. The body is said to be safe in Georgia at the moment.
I would like to add my standard disclaimer here due to the incessant trolls that there is not yet any good, hard, solid, convincing evidence that Rick actually killed a Bigfoot in Pennsylvania at the end of October. Once again, the onus is on Rick. Prove it, Rick.
Christopher Noel says Dyer’s 2nd body may have been taken by the government. I just heard this. I was not even aware that Christopher thought that Dyer had killed a Bigfoot this time, as he has been playing things pretty cautiously since the last fiasco. I know he thinks there are 3 Bigfoots in the Shooting Bigfoot movie, that Rick is shooting live ammo at them, and that one of the shots hits the Bigfoot. But I think that is probably all he really believes at this point, as the whole body story never had a lot of good evidence behind it and now Dyer says that Hank will never show up. It Hank is never going to show up, then why discuss it? Why discuss whether or not Hank was real? No one knows and we will probably never know, so let’s bury it and move on. Why Christopher might believe that Bigfoot #2 was also taken by the state, I have no idea. The implication is also that Christopher theorizes that Bigfoot #1 was taken by the state, but I am not sure if that is what he really believes. I would have to run these theories by him to see what he thinks about them.
Amazing new Bigfoot photos uncovered! All of the photos below came to me via Ray Crowe. They all appeared in his great book, Bigfoot Behavior. I cannot recommend this book highly enough. If you own one Bigfoot book, it might as well be this one. Ray is not a born writer, but he has taught himself to write. At any rate, he has developed his own unique voice that stays constant through all of his writing. I actually enjoy his charming, whimsical and always somewhat skeptical authorial voice. He is a delight to read.
Closeup of the northern Arizona Bigfoot. Copyright Lyle Vann.
This is a photo of a Bigfoot shot in Northern Arizona. This is one amazing photo. It was shot by someone named Lyle Vann, who has copyrighted it. The date on the photo is December 2002. As far as I am concerned, that is a Bigfoot, no two ways about it. It’s not a man in a suit. I suppose it could be a statue, but I have never seen a Bigfoot statue that looks this good. The resemblance to Derek Randles’ Ridgewalker Bigfoot is remarkable. I know nothing about Mr. Vann or the circumstances surrounding this photo.
This is the original of the newspaper photo, and the resolution is much better.
Dennis is the man who is said to have shot dead two Bigfoots, the first in Wyoming in 1968 and the second in Alabama at a later date. This is a part series of photos he took of a Bigfoot he spotted south of Fayetteville, Arkansas. Once again, as far as I am concerned, that is simply a Bigfoot, especially with the other photos to go along with it. The figure is much too large to be a man in a suit. The other three photos are described below.
Four stories from unknown newsletter. The first one is Dennis’ photo of the Bigfoot in Fayetteville, Arkansas in 1997. The upper right shows the Bigfoot photographed in North Arizona which resembles Derek Randles’ Ridgewalker.
This is a much smaller version of the same photo above. One of the photos apparently came from a website called Bruneidirect.com, which is a website promoting the small nation of Brunei nestled in northeastern Sarawak in Malaysia. The photo at the bottom right is a feature piece on a man who seems to be a Bigfoot witness. The bottom left photo is of some bizarre skeleton of a sea creature that washed up on the beach somewhere. It has nothing to do with Bigfoot.
Purported killed Bigfoot north of Casper, Wyoming in 1968.
This is an absolutely amazing of a dead Bigfoot said to have been shot dead north of Casper, Wyoming in 1968. Dennis, the same man who photographed the Bigfoot in Arkansas, is said to have shot and killed this Bigfoot.
What is fascinating is that this is an old story in Bigfoot lore than has been going around the community forever. I discussed in my long piece listing all reports of claimed Bigfoot kills, bodies, burials and funerals up to the present. The photo goes along with this story:
1968: North of Carson, Wyoming. Three men were hired by a rancher to kill a Bigfoot that was killing his cows and sheep by tearing off their legs. Afterward, the body was picked up by a government helicopter and taken to a research facility in Almogordo, New Mexico to be autopsied and studied. Government coverup. Reported by Ray Crowe.
As you can see, this is another story of a government coverup. Apparently the government found out about this killed Bigfoot quite quickly, rushed to the scene and grabbed the Bigfoot and then sent a helicopter to come pick it up and haul it off to a government lab in Almogordo, New Mexico. I do not know much about that region, but I believe that where we have nuclear weapons testing labs. This is also where the first nuclear bombs were tested before we used them on Japan.
Dennis is said to have killed another Bigfoot in Alabama at some later date and this time the government is said to have gotten mad at him and told him to quit killing these things or else. The disposition of the Alabama kill or the circumstances surrounding it are not known.
Dennis photographed this Bigfoot in Fayetteville Arkansas in 1997.
I really do think this is a Bigfoot, especially with the other photos to go along with it and the fascinating Wyoming photo. Notice the huge size of the figure and the odd stance it is taken as it appears to be frozen. The resemblance to the Hovey Bigfoot is striking. That’s not a man in a suit. I guess it could be a statue, but then he had to make two other statues for the other photos, and that makes no sense.
Arkansas Bigfoot uproots a huge stump to throw at Dennis.
The Bigfoot in this photo is said to be pulling a huge stump out of the ground to throw it at Dennis. Amazingly, the photo appears to be of that precisely. That figure is massive. That is not a man in a suit. It could be a statue, but now we have a man making multiple statues.
Arkansas Bigfoot walking away. Notice the resemblance to Patty.
This amazing photo shows the same Bigfoot, this time walking away. It is indistinct, but I call your attention to the right leg that is kicked up in back at precisely the same angle that Patty’s is. If you have seen Thinker Thunker’s video showing how humans and Bigfoot walk completely differently and Bigfoot gait cannot be reproduced by humans, we see a perfect image of that right here.
Note also the right foot lifting up. Remember in the Patty footage, as she lifts up her feet as she walks away. The soles of her feet appeared white, precisely the same color as this Bigfoot. This one actually could be a dead ringer for Patty. Their palms also appear white in a lot of footage in a similar anatomical development. Talking with a friend of mine who works at the Smithsonian, he said it was his opinion that the soles were not really white but instead they may be light gray. He felt the palms might be the same color, but he was clear that neither the palms nor the soles were actually white. He had an explanation for why the gray bottom skin on the extremities look white, but it eludes me at the moment.
A few photos here. First a smaller photo of apparently Dennis and another man with the Bigfoot Dennis shot in 1968. Bottom left is a sideways view of the 1997 Arkansas Bigfoot walking away. Bottom right is the 1997 Arkansas Bigfoot uprooting a stump to throw at a human.
Here are the same photos in their original form as they came to me from Crowe. The two bottom photos were turned on their sides and we had to right them. We had to blow up the Wyoming photo. I think Dennis may be the man with the rifle. I am not sure who the man with the pistol is.
Self-explanatory markup of the Wyoming Killed Bigfoot photo from 1968. The Bigfoot appears to be covering its face with its arms in a very similar fashion as the famous video of Matilda the Sleeping Bigfoot out of Kentucky 2005.
One of my sources does excellent graphics work and he manipulated all of these photos for me. He also marked up the photo above. The markup is based on his theory and is not mine. I do not know what to say about this theory except that it is possible that the markup is just what we are seeing here.
Here is his statement about the markup above:
OK, so here is a diagram/comparison of what I think is most likely the image configuration. In the wild, I and others have observed that the Sas often cover mouth and nose reflexively to hide. The dying Sas probably did the same.
This is a photo of what is apparently two Sasquatches in Canada. There is a small one at the top, once again covering its face with its forearm. On the left is the shoulder of another Sasquatch.
I have no idea what is in this photo above. Here is my graphics guy’s description of it:
The other image here is of a very wooly Canadian Sas similar to Matilda @ Kentucky. This young Sas is holding the right hand over nose and mouth. To the left is the shoulder of an adult Sas. In upper center is the squinty Right eye, the left eye(also squinting) is ringed with lighter fur. Below the eyes is the right hand, fingers bent.The right pinky is below the left eye. It is a large image, so zoom out a bit to see it.
I cannot see any of these things that he refers to. Hopefully I can get a marked up image of this photo also. I also know nothing whatsoever about the back story of this very odd photo.
The end. I have quite a bit more to write about (a ton of notes), but I will save that hopefully for a later post.
