Social, economic, scientific, engineering, and medical evidence is used to support development of policy
and delivery of services to the public. The translation of evidence to policy and practice can be especially
problematic in the environmental health domain, particularly in countries with lax regulations, where
business practices leading to illegal pollution are the norm, and where citizens often lack informational,
organisational, legal, and political resources to mobilise support for action. In such instances, regulatory
interventions through the justice courts have often proven to be successful…Although the legal profession uses research evidence to affect policy change and action across the world in pollution abatement, it has been left out as a key stakeholder of research uptake.
Health Magazine
A Call for Increased Collaboration Between Environmental Health Scientists and Lawyers
Posted on the 25 December 2020 by SoumyadeepbAuthor's Latest Articles
-
Justice: What is It, and What Are Its Types?
-
The State of Awareness, Usage, and Attitudes About Core Outcome Sets in India : Insights from Clinical Trialists and Systematic Reviewers
-
Book Review : The Foreign Gaze and the ‘triangle of People’ in Global Health.
-
On the Nature and Structure of Epistemic Injustice in the NTD Knowledge Ecosystem

