Entertainment Magazine

Twitter & Sheen: Ringside Seats to a Spectacle

By Drpamelarutledge @pamelarutledge

Twitter is just like sitting courtside. While plenty of people have thrown in their two cents on Charlie Sheen’s recent and extraordinarily public bad boy behavior, what’s most interesting to me is that Sheen has taken his campaign to Twitter. While I have no doubt that Sheen has a team of public relations professionals, the use of Twitter makes it appear much more direct. Unlike other forms of media, like Entertainment Tonight interviews, we experience Twitter as authentic, immediate, and down and dirty.

This is true for two reasons. First, any interview, press report, or magazine expose is subject to editing and framing, the questions the journalist or commentator asks, as well as the decisions made by the editor and producer. And while media professionals often strive for some sort of truth, they also are influenced by ratings if not their personal point of view.

Second, Twitter has the aura of transparency. We monitor world changing events, watch revolutions, we feel angst and bear witness to violence. At the more superficial end, we hear how long the line is at the supermarket. But what we do see feels real. It’s constrained only by 140 characters and the author’s good sense, and not subject to the normal rules and gatekeepers of mass media or journalistic positioning. On Twitter, we have the sense that we are first hand witnesses to Sheen’s downward spiral. It is the same sense of Twitter’s genuineness that makes us respond to the striving of Egyptian protestors and the pain of Haitian earthquake victims. It’s not about the relative importance of the events. It’s about the sense of immediacy that Twitter delivers.

It isn’t surprising that Sheen would rack up the Twitter followers. It’s more than morbid curiosity. Sheen has created a very compelling narrative. We could cast Sheen as various protagonists—from the fallen hero to the puer aetemus (eternal boy) in a drug-addled kind of way. Or we can just say that it’s got all the stuff good TV movies are made of: privilege, wealth, success, drugs, sex, celebrity, notoriety, hookers, movie stars, broken families, tragedy, and probably some mental illness (although to be honest, without actually knowing him, diagnosing is both unethical and impossible). But I mean, really, short of a mafia hit man, what more could Hollywood want?

Not only do humans like a good story, though, they crave closure. Our brains demand it. We are driven to know how something ends just to get peace of mind—even when it doesn’t really affect us. How many times have you watched a terrible movie and sat it out to the end to find out what happens?

It’s fair to say that Sheen’s either fairly troubled or pushing the envelope as a brilliant media strategist—perhaps both. But Sheen’s use of Twitter takes the story out of the hands of the mass media and puts all those journalists and commentators in the spectator seats right next to the rest of us. They are no longer the mediators of Sheen’s adventure. That makes it all the more gritty and interesting. Advertisers are, unfortunately, even revisiting his potential in product endorsements. But Sheen should hurry with the ending. We have a notoriously short attention span for this kind of thing. Just ask Lindsay Lohan.

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog