
The film industry began pointing fingers at the reviewers who got a peek before the actual screenings and bashed the movies unapologetically, resulting in low theater turnouts. Reviewers defended themselves saying good movies will be well received. The point was proved by 'Wonder Woman' and 'Guardians', though I wouldn't count them as classics; but as good entertainment.
Then comes July.
'Despicable Me 3' was doing decently well as the month began though not up to the expectations. But the first weekend saw the most anticipated wall crawler's new incarnation in 'Spiderman: Homecoming". Not only was the movie very well reviewed, but it also made a grand opening weekend of 117m$, that surpassed most expectations. It was like a breath of fresh air for the industry looking at the dismal box office performance of the summer. With such ratings and anticipation, it was a sure shot hit and is expected to continue energizing the box office for weeks to come. But, will it?

The week before 'Spiderman' reached the theatres another July blockbuster opened for the critics to review - 'The War for the Planet of the Apes'. It's reception was astounding. So, it was expected that this movie will dethrone 'Spiderman' in a week. Sure enough, this weekend, that's exactly what happened. 'War' made $55m, while 'Spiderman' had to settle for $45m, which is a drop of above 60%; a much sharper drop than expected. Did the well reviewed 'War' cause this? It might have.

Coming into the mix next week, is the legend Christopher Nolan's 'Dunkirk'. Guess what? The movie is amazing too. It is one of the best war movies as per one critic. That is yet another greatly reviewed movie in direct competition with some of the other best-reviewed movies of the year. Will people come out to see 'Dunkirk'? Or will they choose to see the other movies pending in their list? Or will they just choose to remain at home?
