I retweeted today this powerful exercise in self-reflexive journalism
filed from Goma on November 27 by Philip Gourevitch and posted on the
New Yorker Web site.
There are blocks of the piece I disagree with, but overall the report
is a valid condensed vignette of the recent history of the DRC.
I also disagree with the piece's underlying essentialism and
essentialization of the Congolese--though "outrage as a Congolese
condition of being makes for disturbing lasting impression on one's
mind.
But that's precisely why this kind of "thick description" is called
self-reflexive reporting.
A TEASER:
"It is impossible to be Congolese," [Salvador Muhindo] said at one point,
"without being continuously outraged."
Read the colorful narrative here:
m.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2012/11/outraged-in-congo.html
***
PHOTO CREDITS: Phil Moore/AFP/Getty
Society Magazine
Continuous Outrage as Congolesse Essence (New Yorker's Philip Gourevitch)
Posted on the 28 November 2012 by Aengw @alexengweteAuthor's Latest Articles
-
DRC: Mobile Phone Service Providers Restore SMS & Mobile Internet But Continue To Block Facebook & Twitter
-
Kinshasa: Goofing Museveni Opens 17th COMESA With Gay Antijokes Amid Guffaws
-
Kinshasa: MP Martin Fayulu's Crusade Against Electoral Commission Chair Apollinaire Malumalu
-
DRC: Season of Treason And Uncertainties Within Kabila's Camp