After watching the new Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice Comic-Con trailer yesterday I hopped over to BirthMoviesDeath to get their take on it, amused to see that their headline read: "No Laughs Survived The BATMAN V SUPERMAN: DAWN OF JUSTICE Panel." I instantly begged to differ because I definitely laughed when Jesse Eisenberg's Lex Luthor closes the trailer with an unintentionally hilarious subdued reading of the line, "The red capes are coming! The red capes are coming!" Then I read Evan Saathoff 's piece and saw that he would probably agree with me, "I think I might be all alone on this, but this movie looks absolutely ridiculous. So much of it feels awesome, but the seriousness on display here crosses over into comic levels a number of times. This is especially true whenever Lex Luthor shows up, but also the couple times we see Superman and Bruce Wayne looking at things with their strongest 'I want to kill you' faces."
That's actually a fantastic trailer. I don't mean that it necessarily makes Batman v Superman look like a fantastic movie, but that trailer absolutely lets me know what kind of movie Batman v Superman is going to be. As summarized by THR, "The world is torn between hero worship and outright suspicion of Superman (Henry Cavill, who spends the entire trailer silent, tellingly enough) in the wake of the events of Man of Steel - somewhat understandably, considering the carnage caused in that movie's final battle - with Batman being manipulated by someone into deciding that Superman needs to be stopped [...] It's brash, unsubtle - the operatic music when the logo is revealed being a genuinely glorious zenith of melodrama - and it sets out the stakes of the movie perfectly; you know what this movie is going to be like after watching, and it's something that's both more realistic and more of a heightened reality than what Marvel offers in its movies."
The question becomes whether or not the version of Batman v Superman communicated in that trailer is something you want to see. I am reminded of a conversation I had with a best friend as we left a screening of Kingsman: The Secret Service earlier this year. Throughout the film, she sunk deeper and deeper into her seat and her sighs of annoyance grew louder and louder, clearly indicating she was hating nearly every single minute of what she was seeing, sophomoric anal sex jokes and all. Afterward, she conceded that perhaps Kingsman's true sin was simply that it was not the right movie for her, going something like, "That movie was clearly not made with someone like me in mind." I can't say that about myself with Batman v Superman because I fall right into the target audience, but I suspect that this probably isn't going to be the right movie for me. I usually prefer jokes and story, and this is going to have plenty of grim faces and spectacle. It's just a different philosophical approach, and it's not really connecting with me right now.
Here are a couple of stray reactions:
1) The World Trade Center Evocation Seems Wrong
As such, whether we believe them or not Zack Syder and company have been saying that it was always their intention to revisit the consequences of Superman's actions, and the trailer reveals that Bruce Wayne was personally affected since one of those crumbling buildings in Metropolis was owned by WayneCorps. Worse than that, Bruce was actually on the ground and rushed headlong into the approaching debris cloud to save someone. This looks so thoroughly inspired by the scenes on the ground of New York City as pedestrians and first responders dealt with the collapse of the World Trade Center. So many movies have evoked 9/11 since then, and it's an obvious reference point for Batman v Superman. However, it just feels wrong to me.
2) That's Not How I Pictured The Batcave






9) Who's the Diver?
10) Why Do We Need to See Batman's Parents Killed Again?



