You [Jack] have invented a very useful younger brother called Ernest, in order that you may be able to come up to town as often as you like. I have invented an invaluable permanent invalid called Bunbury, in order that I may be able to go down into the country whenever I choose. Bunbury is perfectly invaluable. If it wasn’t for Bunbury’s extraordinary bad health, for instance, I wouldn’t be able to dine with you at Willis’s to-night, for I have been really engaged to Aunt Augusta for more than a week.
I had planned on analysing the text with the use of several literary theories; a little bit of reader-response criticism, a dash of psychoanalysis, a handful of the lexical units required for structuralism, a splattering of deconstruction and a pinch of Marxism. But then I remembered I have a prior engagement with Cedric de Montferrat who urgently requires my attendance for… umm… for something extremely important.
Thus, dear reader, I must leave you to consider alone: Is having a Bunbury lying or is it a morally acceptable way of escaping social obligations?Would you create a Bunbury to avoid dinner with Aunt Augusta?
Thank you for reading, Lara.