During this time of crisis my employer has suggested keeping an eye on the World Health Organization website.I’ve been doing that with a nearly religious fervor.I’ve been looking over the daily situation reports.These not only contain advice not poisoned by government agendas, but also list the new outbreaks and provide pages of statistics.The numbers differ from many news sources, but WHO tracks new cases, the number of deaths, and the vectors of transmission.I’m trying to make a learning exercise out of this, instead of just further cause for panic.More secretive world states, WHO warns, are preventing containment by under-reporting.You’d think that in a time of global crisis that even autocracies would want to cooperate.You’d think wrong.
Photo credit: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), via Wikimedia Commons
WHO has indicated that some nations (the usual suspects) are keeping numbers down not through effective measures, but through not reporting them.Since honest reporting helps to trace, track, and understand transmission, such nations are essentially holding out hope that they’ll somehow bend this crisis to their advantage and appear stronger than they actually are.I’m guessing these nations are male.
Interestingly, the names of the countries on the overall list don’t always match those I’ve learned in my own study of geography.The Vatican, for example, is listed as “Holy See.”I know that’s its name, but it seems kind of odd against Lichtenstein, Peru, and Mozambique.The Holy See, last time I noticed, had 6 cases.The number gave me pause. With a population of just over 600, Vatican City does seem to be a male nation.It’s a country of clerics.
Those in ministry toe a difficult line during a pandemic.Governments are telling people to isolate themselves to halt the spread of disease, and yet clergy, like medical professionals, often have to put themselves in harm’s way.I think of how Pope Francis had laid hands on the sick, even when it must’ve been difficult to do so.Local churches have, for the most part, shut down.Clergy are self-isolating, social distancing.It is the socially responsible thing to do.How it fits within an ecclesiastical view of life, however, must be quite a balancing act.I often think of how I’d be acting if I were a minister.Would I go to the home of someone suffering in isolation, or would I be afraid of infecting my own family?Would I be a nation reaching out to the rest of the world with largess, or would I be a holy see cut off from the people?I don’t have an answer.I wonder if anyone does.
