6. Any other special studies which deal with some abstract or prose content taken out of the work. Nearly all departments of knowledge may conceivably find their own materials in literature, and take them out. Studies have been made of Chaucer 8767 s command of mediaeval sciences, of Spenser 8767 s view of the Irish question, of Shakespeare 8767 s understanding of the law, of Milton 8767 s geography, of Hardy 8767 s place-names. The critic may well inform himself of these materials as possessed by the artist, but his business as critic is to discuss the literary assimilation of them.
Max Weber's View of Objectivity in Social Science
In spite of his past problems with the League, Burke was on the committee to draft the call for the Third Congress. In a letter to Burke on April 66, League Executive Secretary Franklin Folsom asked Burke to draft a brief call "incorporating the best features" of the versions prepared by Malcolm Cowley, Harry Carlisle, and Henry Hart (Folsom). The final version of the call included Burke's primary suggestion, a focus on the term "democracy," which he believed was the key concept underlying earlier drafts. The call for the Congress also emphasized the importance of the international political climate to the community of writers:
Small Change - The New Yorker
The most, important recent diversion from the orthodox course of literary studies was that undertaken by the New Humanists. I regret to think that it was not the kind of diversion which I am advocating nor the kind approved by Professor Crane, who comments briefly against it. Unquestionably the Humanists did divert, and the refreshment was grateful to anybody who felt resentful for having his literary predilections ignored under the schedule of historical learning. But in the long run the diversion proved to be nearly as unliterary as the round of studies from which it took off at a tangent. No picnic ideas were behind it.
Imperfect Critics. . Eliot. 1921. The Sacred Wood
A quality critical thinking essay is always written in a serious tone without touching the feelings and emotions of the writer and therefore respecting them. Every statement needs to be supported by quotations. Any critical essay example can either agree or disagree with the work analyzed.
Studies in the technique of the art belong to criticism certainly. They cannot belong anywhere else, because the technique is not peculiar to any prose materials discoverable in the work of art, nor to anything else but the unique form of that art. A very large volume of studies is indicated by this classification. They would be technical studies of poetry, for instance, the art I am specifically discussing, if they treated its metric its inversions, solecisms, lapses from the prose norm of language, and from close prose logic its tropes its fictions, or inventions, by which it secures "aesthetic distance" and removes itself from history or any other devices, on the general understanding that any systematic usage which does not hold good for prose is a poetic device.
Similar considerations hold, I think, for the critique of fiction, or of the non-literary arts. I remark this for the benefit of philosophers who believe, with propriety, that the arts are fundamentally one. But I would prefer to leave the documentation to those who are better qualified.
Criticism must become more scientific, or precise and systematic, and this means that it must be developed by the collective and sustained effort of learned persons-which means that its proper seat is in the universities.
Nevertheless it is from the professors of literature, in this country the professors of English for the most part, that I should hope eventually for the erection of intelligent standards of criticism. It is their business.
5. Moral studies. The moral standard applied is the one appropriate to the reviewer it may be the Christian ethic, or the Aristotelian one, or the new proletarian gospel. But the moral content is not the whole content, which should never be relinquished.
On Sunday, June 9, Burke presented his paper at a closed session on "The Writer in Politics," which included presentations by two of the editors of The New Masses --. Magil and Joseph Freeman--and by Vincent Sheean, a journalist and future vice-president of the League. Magil discussed fascist rhetoric in America, warning that its "anti-fascist pretense" was "its most potent rhetorical device" (qtd. in Stewart 699). His presentation also emphasized the role that the writer must play in countering fascist rhetoric in America:
"Essay on social criticism of marketing" in pictures. More images "Essay on social criticism of marketing".
