I took delivery of a new television set today. We now have
his and her TVs, after I finally resolved that watching the screen when Outdoor
Man controls the remote is just too tricky. Whenever I thought that we were
settling down to watch something, lo the channel changed. What is it about men
and their innate desire to surf TV channels? For a gender that is notorious for
its inability to “juggle,” it certainly has to be congratulated on being able
to follow a dozen programmes contemporaneously.
A family law colleague once remarked to me, after
encountering similar issues in her own living room, that she found it curious
that she had never been asked by a client to draft a divorce petition
incorporating allegations of unreasonable behavior based on a husband’s operation
of the television remote controller. I never did either. I do recall
proceedings, once upon a time, which referred to a wife’s concealment of the
remote but generally speaking the fairer sex clearly learnt long ago that
there are some battles that are not worth the fight.
Moreover, when house contents came to be divided, in my experience
it was not unknown for a husband to magnanimously concede that his wife could
have the majority of the furniture and white goods, so long only as he could
retain their largest television set. Fortuitously she usually agreed to him
having the remote controller too.