Psychology Magazine

Materialism Alone Can't Explain Consciousness? A Flawed Argument.

By Deric Bownds @DericBownds
Adam Frank does an interesting piece at aeon.co in which he suggests that since the materialist position in physics appears to rest on shaky metaphysical ground, any materialist explanation of consciousness has a similar problem. So what? I don’t get it. Materialist explanations that are shaky on metaphysical grounds let us fly airplanes, build bridges, and run the internet. Giant strides being made in artificial intelligence suggest that they might explain consciousness (see Theory of cortical function Mindblog post.) The only thing Frank is critiquing is those consciousness researchers who appeal to the authority of physics. Yes, materialism alone can’t explain consciousness. In terms of the underlying physics it can’t explain anything! I pass on the first and last portion of his essay:
Materialism holds the high ground these days in debates over that most ultimate of scientific questions: the nature of consciousness. When tackling the problem of mind and brain, many prominent researchers advocate for a universe fully reducible to matter. ‘Of course you are nothing but the activity of your neurons,’ they proclaim. That position seems reasonable and sober in light of neuroscience’s advances, with brilliant images of brains lighting up like Christmas trees while test subjects eat apples, watch movies or dream. And aren’t all the underlying physical laws already known?
...the unfinished business of quantum mechanics levels the playing field. The high ground of materialism deflates when followed to its quantum mechanical roots, because it then demands the acceptance of metaphysical possibilities that seem no more ‘reasonable’ than other alternatives. Some consciousness researchers might think that they are being hard-nosed and concrete when they appeal to the authority of physics. When pressed on this issue, though, we physicists are often left looking at our feet, smiling sheepishly and mumbling something about ‘it’s complicated’. We know that matter remains mysterious just as mind remains mysterious, and we don’t know what the connections between those mysteries should be. Classifying consciousness as a material problem is tantamount to saying that consciousness, too, remains fundamentally unexplained.  (comment from me:  Unexplained like our ability to fly airplanes?)
Rather than sweeping away the mystery of mind by attributing it to the mechanisms of matter, we can begin to move forward by acknowledging where the multiple interpretations of quantum mechanics leave us. It’s been more than 20 years since the Australian philosopher David Chalmers introduced the idea of a ‘hard problem of consciousness’. Following work by the American philosopher Thomas Nagel, Chalmers pointed to the vividness – the intrinsic presence – of the perceiving subject’s experience as a problem no explanatory account of consciousness seems capable of embracing. Chalmers’s position struck a nerve with many philosophers, articulating the sense that there was fundamentally something more occurring in consciousness than just computing with meat. But what is that ‘more’?
Some consciousness researchers see the hard problem as real but inherently unsolvable; others posit a range of options for its account. Those solutions include possibilities that overly project mind into matter. Consciousness might, for example, be an example of the emergence of a new entity in the Universe not contained in the laws of particles. There is also the more radical possibility that some rudimentary form of consciousness must be added to the list of things, such as mass or electric charge, that the world is built of. Regardless of the direction ‘more’ might take, the unresolved democracy of quantum interpretations means that our current understanding of matter alone is unlikely to explain the nature of mind. It seems just as likely that the opposite will be the case.
While the materialists might continue to wish for the high ground of sobriety and hard-headedness, they should remember the American poet Richard Wilbur’s warning:
Kick at the rock, Sam Johnson, break your bones:  
But cloudy, cloudy is the stuff of stones.

You Might Also Like :

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog

These articles might interest you :

  • My Umbrella and I

    Umbrella

    I bet each one of you has an umbrella story (or several) to tell. My first memory of an umbrella is probably from the time I was five-or younger-huddling under ... Read more

    The 17 July 2018 by   Vidyasury
    DIARIES
  • Downward Causation

    Downward Causation

    I've argued for the idea that social phenomena are generated by the actions, thoughts, and mental frameworks of myriad actors (link). This expresses the idea... Read more

    The 17 July 2018 by   Dlittle30
    SOCIETY
  • Ikk Panjab Rajouri Garden Food and Restaurant Review #FoodReview

    Ikk Panjab is a synonym of the blissful dining experience. Nothing falls short of expectation here. A place to rediscover lost recipes. There are many factors t... Read more

    The 17 July 2018 by   Jaideep Khanduja
    DIARIES, SELF EXPRESSION
  • A Food-Lover’s Guide to Greece

    Food-Lover’s Guide Greece

    Ah, Greek food! Just the thought of a warm filo pastry with a mizithra cheese stuffing and a cup of dark Greek coffee brings back near-perfectly preserved... Read more

    The 17 July 2018 by   Niviya Vas
    LIFESTYLE
  • 2018 Monsoon Must Haves

    The monsoons have arrived and along with its relief, have come a few of monsoon’s undesired experiences. We tend to not put on our best clothes during the... Read more

    The 17 July 2018 by   Meet Rv
  • SAAM Arcade: Game Spaces

    What does "Game Spaces" mean to me? When we began discussing our plans for this year's Independent Developer Showcase, we knew that we wanted to focus on... Read more

    The 17 July 2018 by   Americanart
    ART & DESIGN, CULTURE
  • “There Was No Significant Association Between Saturated Fat and Cardiovascular...

    Does eating saturated fat increase the risk of heart disease? Or is something else the culprit? And which risk markers should we look at when investigating whic... Read more

    The 17 July 2018 by   Dietdoctor
    DIET & WEIGHT, HEALTH, HEALTHY LIVING, MEDICINE

Magazines