Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase
The largest bank in the United States, and perhaps the sleaziest, has been involved in our debt-collection story from the outset--and I'm just now finding out about it. I suspect hundreds of thousands of other consumers also our in the dark about this banking behemoth's ties to their debt-collection issues.
We are talking about JPMorgan Chase, which has an estimated $2 trillion in assets, making it the largest private corporation in the world. Based on recent headlines, it also is one of the most unethical organizations in the world--and that might explain why Chase found debt-collection to be an attractive industry.
I have written extensively about the experience my wife and I have had with debt collectors who routinely and flagrantly violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), the law that is supposed to govern their actions. I also have shown that the FDCPA is a notoriously weak, and that has allowed debt collection to become perhaps the darkest corner of the financial-services sector--and that's saying something, given recent news reports involving scandalous trades and the rigging of international interest rates.
JPMorgan Chase has been smack in the middle of schemes that indicate bankers have learned nothing from the near collapse of our economy in fall 2008. So you can imagine that my schnauzer ears went on alert when a reader informed me recently that JPMorgan Chase has quietly become a major player among debt collectors--and, in fact, has played a central role in our own story.
How did that happen? Well, it started on November 15, 2006, when a company called One Equity Partners closed on its acquisition of NCO Group. One Equity Partners, it turns out, is a wholly owned subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase; in fact, it is the company's private investment arm.
What is NCO? Based in Horsham, Pennsylvania, it is one of the largest, and least reputable, debt collectors in the country. It has played a front-and-center role in our own debt-collection story. Here is how I explained it in an earlier post:
In our case, the original creditor allegedly was American Express, the debt collector or buyer (I'm not sure which) was NCO Financial Services, and the phone calls came mostly from Ingram & Associates, a Birmingham law firm.
NCO apparently is notorious for flagrant violations of the FDCPA. Public records indicate that Ingram & Associates' principal Angie Ingram is part of something called the "NCO Attorney Network"--even though her surrogates repeatedly told us Ms. Ingram "worked for American Express," "had been hired by American Express to sue you," "had a fiduciary relationship with American Express," etc.
The Ingram & Associates folks threw all kinds of insults, threats, and falsehoods at us. So NCO caused Ingram & Associates to go after me for a debt that allegedly was in my name. And Ingram proceeded to violate federal law with impunity. Here is just a small sampling:
First of all, neither NCO nor Ingram ever sent us anything in writing, informing us of our rights to dispute the debt or have it validated, as required by the FDCPA. They simply started calling us and alleging that we owed a debt.
Did they ever offer any written proof that we owed the debt? Nope. But they were happy to say they could sue us and that we could wind up having the deed to our house auctioned off "on the courthouse steps."
Could Ingram carry out this threat? Well, they didn't. Seeing as how they never offered a shred of proof that I owed the debt, it's hard to see how they could have. And seeing as how the debt was in my name only, but our house is jointly owned by my wife and me, it's hard to see how they could sell the deed to our house on the courthouse steps.
But the fine folks at Ingram & Associates, apparently with the blessing of NCO and American Express, wanted us to believe we could wind up homeless because of an alleged credit-card debt that they had not proved we owed.
Thanks to an alert Legal Schnauzer reader, I learned just the other day that JPMorgan Chase was involved in this scam all along. Jamie Dimon, the company's CEO, has become the face of banking arrogance in recent weeks. Dimon's reputation might sink even lower when the general public becomes aware that his firm has dipped a massive toe in the debt-collection swamp.
How has this affected Mrs. Schnauzer and me? Let's consider a timeline: One Equity Partners, Chase's investment arm, buys NCO in November 2006; we start hearing from both NCO and its surrogate, Ingram & Associates, in fall 2007. JPMorgan Chase owned NCO for several months before the company ever contacted us. That means Chase was driving the sleazy collection train in our case the whole time.In legal terms, NCO had an agency relationship with Chase, and Ingram & Associates had an agency relationship with both NCO and Chase. That means Chase is vicariously liable for the violations of federal law in our case. If you've been unlawfully targeted by NCO in roughly the past five years, Chase probably is vicariously liable in your case, too.
What do we mean by vicarious liability? It's a legal doctrine that arises in many lawsuits and is explained here.
NCO never has been a noble outfit; you can Google "NCO and fraud" and pull up volumes of articles about various scams involving NCO and debt collection. But it's possible that the company has become even worse since falling under the JPMorgan Chase umbrella in late 2006.
After all, consider what we've learned about Chase in recent weeks: It made a monstrously bad trade that resulted in a loss that first was estimated at $2 billion and now has risen to $5.8 billion--the total loss might wind up being $7.5 billion. Chase also has been linked to the LIBOR rate-fixing scandal that, so far, has focused largely on the British bank Barclays.
How dirty is JPMorgan Chase? The world is in the process of finding out. But my wife and I got an up-close view in the course of our debt-collection matter. For posterity's sake, I tape recorded several conversations in which Ingram representatives made multiple statements that grossly violated the FDCPA.
We soon will be sharing those tapes with Legal Schnauzer readers. It will give you cringe-inducing insight into the way large debt collectors try to frighten consumers into paying debts they might not even owe. And you can almost bet, in many cases, the collectors cannot prove a particular consumer owes a specific debt.
That's because record-keeping in the debt-collection field is worse than sloppy; it's almost nonexistent. But that doesn't stop collectors from trying to con consumers into paying money they might not legally owe.
That's what happened in our case. And we now know that various entities were operating on behalf of JPMorgan Chase all along.
