The mission of this testing - to identify and eliminate deficiencies in the academic achievement of underprivileged children - represents the noblest of democratic ideals, as I write in my book. But this regular testing has done little more than repeatedly identify deficiencies. In the process, the pressure to boost test results has led to stressful test prep for students and teachers alike, and it has constricted curricula, cutting time for important subjects on which students aren't tested. Even former secretary of education Arne Duncan conceded in 7569 that testing is "sucking the oxygen out of the room in a lot of schools."
National Center for the Study of Privatization in
The growth of Satellite TV and the developments in computer technology have further escalated the information revolution. These technological developments have increased the requirements of highly educated and well-trained technical manpower.
What does privatization in public education really mean
In these English medium public schools, parents pay the full cost of education (generally leaving a good profit margin for the educational entrepreneurs) while, in the state run schools, highly subsidized education is imparted in the vernacular.
The Privatization of Education: How New Orleans Went from
The research is murky at best in each of the studies done on the impacts of privatization. There is no question that public schools face issues and have some restructuring to do to be successful, but I do not believe that privatization is the answer. The video from your website about the privatization attempts in Wisconsin show that clearly. Of the schools, 66 showed increased reading and math, but not others, and the increase wasn't that big. Moving to privatized education is a move to corporate control instead of a non-profit social justice based, Human Rights based, education. Public education has plenty of problems, but I don't believe that privatizing it is the answer.
You can see the rest of her review here , and below is the Q & A I did with Abrams about his book and the privatization movement:
Majority of the institutions in higher education belong to category 'd', but under pressure from teachers association, they are moving into category 'c'.
At the elementary levels of education, the state-sponsored schools have been responsible for the spread of literacy, more especially in rural areas, but even in urban areas, bulk of the schools are state run or aided by the state.
I think privatization would further create a gulf between the different groups. Already there is difference between the haves and the not haves of the different neighborhoods school.
In addition, the Human Rights Council has established an open-ended intergovernmental working group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights , whose mandate shall be to elaborate an international legally binding instrument to regulate, in international human rights law, the activities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises. For further information, see ESCR-Net and FIDH's Treaty Initiative.
Where there is sufficient transparency for proper contract enforcement, the free market works beautifully, and privatization thus makes good sense. We don't begrudge a restaurateur or bookseller a profit because we as consumers can easily judge the quality of goods, service and ambiance provided and, thus, decide whether to return. Likewise, privatizing the delivery of discrete goods and services is justifiable. For a school district, in this light, to outsource bus transportation or textbook provision to for-profit enterprises is understandable and efficient.
"Privatization of education in india" in pictures. More images "Privatization of education in india".
