Health Magazine

Why Are Treatment Centers Afraid of Anti-Craving Medications?

By Dirkh @dirk57
Why are Treatment Centers Afraid of Anti-Craving Medications?
Using What Works
Why do so many drug treatment centers continue to shun science by ignoring medications that ease the burden of withdrawal for many addicts? That’s the question posed in an article by Alison Knopf in the May-June issue of Addiction Professional, titled “The Medication Holdouts.”
“Nowhere else in medicine,” Knopf writes, “are the people who treat a condition so suspicious of the very medications designed to help the condition in which they specialize.”
Acamprosate, a drug used to treat alcoholism, is a good case in point. A dozen European studies examining thousands of alcohol test subjects found that the drug increased the number of days that most subjects were able to remain abstinent. But when a German drug maker decided to market the drug in the U.S., fierce advocates for drug-free addiction therapy came out in force, even though the drug was ultimately approved for use.
Disulfiram, naltrexone, acamprosate, methadone, buprenorphine—the evidence for all of them is solid. Knopf cites the case of buprenorphine:
“‘There are scores of peer-reviewed journal articles that evaluate the success of buprenorphine,’ says Nicholas Reuter, MPH, senior public health adviser in the Division of Pharmacologic Therapies at the federal Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT). ‘It's well established that the data and the evidence are there. Not treating patients with a medication consigns most of them to relapse, adds Reuter. While some opioid-addicted patients, as many as 20 percent, do respond to abstinence-based therapy, ‘That still leaves us with the 80 percent who don't,’ he says.”
Dr. Charles O'Brien, one the nation’s most respected addiction professionals and a Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania, is incensed that anti-craving medications are not more widely used. “It's unethical not to use medications,” he says. “This is a subject that I feel very strongly about.” O’Brien told Addiction Professional he no longer cares who he offends on the subject. “If you're discouraging people from taking medications, you are behaving in an unethical way; you are depriving your patients of a way to turn themselves around. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean you have to keep your patients away from it.”
And at the Association for Addiction Professionals, “the prevailing philosophy is pro-medication,” Knopf writes. Misti Storie, education and training consultant for the group, told Knopf that the “disconnect” at treatment centers is due to a “lack of education about the connection between biology and addiction.” Counselors working in centers that do not allow anti-craving medications are in a tough spot, Storie acknowledged.
It is continually astonishing that treatment centers--where the primary goal is supposed to be the prevention of relapse, even though the success rate remains abysmal--would spurn medications that often help to accomplish precisely that goal. Relapse rates hover around 80%, by an amalgam of estimates, so it’s not like rehabs are wildly successful at what they do. What’s really behind the resistance?
What stands between many addicts and the new forms of treatment is “pharmacological Calvinism.” I would love to claim this term as my own, but it was coined by Cornell University researcher Gerald Klerman. Pharmacological Calvinism may be defined as the belief that treating any psychological symptoms with a pill is tantamount to ethical surrender, or, at the very least, a serious failure of will. As Peter Kramer quoted Klerman in Listening to Prozac: If a drug makes you feel better, then by definition “somehow it is morally wrong and the user is likely to suffer retribution with either dependence, liver damage, or chromosomal change, or some other form of medical-theological damnation.”
Photo credit: www.life123.com

You Might Also Like :

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog

These articles might interest you :

  • Eating Well During Cancer Treatment

    Eating Well During Cancer Treatment

    Eating well during treatment is a challenge! The side effects of chemo and radiation leave many of us with little appetite. If it isn’t nausea or mouth sores... Read more

    By  Jean Campbell
    HEALTH
  • Is There a Recommended Diet Following Treatment for Breast Cancer?

    There Recommended Diet Following Treatment Breast Cancer?

    Is There a Diet for Women Who’ve Had Breast Cancer? Our post today is from Julie Pippert who speaks to advertising that promotes certain foods and beverages as... Read more

    By  Jean Campbell
    HEALTH
  • Why We Love Chips

    Love Chips

    image credit Eating just one chip (potato crisp, French fries, or whatever you call them) without then devouring the rest is almost impossible for most people t... Read more

    By  Gerard
    HEALTH
  • Your Path Report…A Blueprint for Treatment

    Your Path Report…A Blueprint Treatment

    Whatever you may know about your cancer prior to surgery, until the pathology report is in and your doctor reviews it with you, you do not know all there is to... Read more

    By  Jean Campbell
    HEALTH
  • Navigating Treatment…Radiation

    Navigating Treatment…Radiation

    Once you know your radiation treatment schedule, it is time to develop a plan that will get you through the duration of your 6+ weeks of Monday through Friday... Read more

    By  Jean Campbell
    HEALTH
  • Navigating Treatment…Chemotherapy

    Navigating Treatment…Chemotherapy

    While the planning tips for getting through radiation are also appropriate for getting through chemotherapy, there are more things to prepare for when getting... Read more

    By  Jean Campbell
    HEALTH
  • After Active Treatment…Then What?

    After Active Treatment…Then What?

    After completing active treatment your treatment journey may not be over.Depending on the results of the path report there may still be other treatments or... Read more

    By  Jean Campbell
    HEALTH

Magazines