"I know a lot of people are angry that we have left the president's posts," Zuckerberg wrote in a Facebook article.
Trump's posts on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter read: "These THUGS dishonor the memory of George Floyd, and I won't let that happen. I just spoke to Governor Tim Walz and told him that the military is with him all the time. Any difficulty and we will take control but, when the looting begins, the shooting will begin. Thank you! "
Facebook, on the other hand, remained silent on the issue for 18 hours until Zuckerberg's post appeared.
Justifying leaving the posts on Facebook and Instagram, Zuckerberg wrote: "We looked very closely at the post that talked about the protests in Minnesota to assess whether it violated our policies. Although the post has a troubling historical reference, we have decided to leave it out because the National Guard references meant that we read it as a warning about state action, and we think people should know if the government plans to deploy force. regarding incitement to violence allows for discussion of state use of force, although I think the current situation raises important questions about the potential limits of this discussion. "
When testifying before Congress in October, Zuckerberg said: "If someone, including a politician, says things that can cause, that call for violence, or could risk imminent physical damage ... we will remove this content. " He was answering questions from Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez when he made the claim.
In his Friday article, Zuckerberg criticized Twitter for handling Trump's messages.
"Unlike Twitter, it is not our policy to put out a warning to posts that may incite violence, because we believe that if a publication incites violence, it should be deleted, whether it is worthy of 'interest or not, even if it comes from a politician., "he wrote.
Earlier in the week, Zuckerberg criticized Twitter for verifying Trump's false allegations regarding California postal ballots. Zuckerberg made these comments on Fox News.
Despite this, Zuckerberg said in his message that he did not agree with the post of president.
"I had a hard time responding to the president's tweets and messages all day long. Personally, I have a negative visceral reaction to this kind of confrontational and inflammatory rhetoric," he wrote, adding, "But I am responsible for reacting not only personally, but as the leader of an institution committed to freedom of expression. "
At the end of his message, Zuckerberg concluded: "People may agree or disagree on where we should draw the line, but I hope they understand our overall philosophy is that it is better to have this discussion. outdoors, especially when the stakes are so high. - I don't agree at all with the way the President talked about it, but I think people should be able to see it for themselves, because at the end In the end, the responsibility of people in positions of power can only arise when their speech is examined to the letter. "
Source link
