No portion of the federal budget is as large as the military budget. In fact, it is larger than all other portions of the discretionary budget combined. That much money is not needed to defend the United States and its allies. Far too much is spent in a corrupt way -- on systems that are not needed, and just to fund the bottom line of corporations. Elizabeth Warren wants to stop this. She writes:
It’s past time to cut our bloated defense budget. Defense contractor influence is a big part of how we ended up with a Pentagon budget that will "); letter-spacing: -0.004em; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.csis.org/analysis/press-briefing-analysis-fy-2019-defense-budget" class="cm dw lp lq lr ls" target="_blank">cost morethis year than Ronald Reagan spent at the height of the Cold War. That’s more than the federal government spends on education, medical research, border security, housing, the FBI, disaster relief, the State Department, foreign aid — everything else in the discretionary budget put together. What’s worse, it’s how we end up spending money on the wrong things — too much investment in the technologies of the past, and not enough focus on the needs of the future.
It’s wrong. It’s wasteful. It’s unsustainable. And it’s bad for our national security. If more money for the Pentagon could solve our security challenges, we would have solved them by now. It is time to identify which programs actually benefit American security in the 21st century, and which programs merely line the pockets of defense contractors — then pull out a sharp knife and make some cuts. And while the defense industry will inevitably have a seat at the table, they shouldn’t get to own the table itself. We have to call this what it is: corruption, plain and simple. The latest example came last week, when President Trump "); text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.rollcall.com/news/congress/shanahan-confirmation-boeing-likely-bumpy-senate" class="cm dw lp lq lr ls" target="_blank">nominatedPatrick Shanahan, a former top Boeing executive, to be Secretary of Defense. I "); text-decoration: none;" href="https://thehill.com/policy/defense/342540-senate-confirms-former-boeing-vp-as-deputy-defense-secretary" class="cm dw lp lq lr ls" target="_blank">opposed Shanahan’s prior nomination to work as Trump’s #2 at DOD because of his lack of foreign policy experience and my concerns about his ability to separate himself from Boeing’s financial interests after a lifetime spent working for the company. More recently, I asked the DOD watchdog "); text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/20/us/politics/boeing-pentagon.html" class="cm dw lp lq lr ls" target="_blank">to investigate after receiving reports that he had used his official position as Deputy Secretary to promote Boeing’s interests within the Pentagon. The IG cleared Secretary Shanahan of breaking existing ethics rules — but his obvious potential conflicts of interest remain. The truth is that our existing laws are far too weak to effectively limit the undue influence of giant military contractors at the Department of Defense. The response of Congress shouldn’t be to confirm Shanahan. It should be to change the rules. I’ve already introduced the most sweeping and ambitious anti-corruption legislation since Watergate. My proposal would fundamentally change the way Washington does business, taking power in Washington away from the powerful and the well-connected and putting it back in the hands of the American people. But the stakes are higher when it comes to our national security. That’s why today, I introduced the Department of Defense Ethics and Anti-Corruption Act. Here’s my plan: Slam Shut the Revolving Door Between Giant Contractors and the Pentagon. My plan would ban giant defense contractors from hiring senior DOD officials and general and flag officers for four years after they leave the Department. It would also require contractors to identify the former DOD officials who work for them and what they’re working on. In order to fully eliminate the opportunity for conflicts of interest, a former employee or executive of a defense contractor who joins the government would be totally banned from working on anything that could influence their former bosses. No more questions about whether the Acting Secretary of Defense is putting the financial interests of Boeing ahead of the national security interests of the United States. Ban DOD Officials from Owning Contractor Stock. This one is a no-brainer. My plan would ban all senior DOD officials from owning or trading any stock of giant defense contractors. And it would ban all DOD employees from owning or trading stock if they’re in a position to influence that contractor’s bottom line. Limit Foreign Government Hiring of American National Security Officials. A former National Security Council "); text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/05/14/china-is-using-washington-swamp-against-us/?utm_term=.a42e99ddf2ba" class="cm dw lp lq lr ls" target="_blank">staffer now lobbies for Chinese telecom company Huawei, whose executives are currently facing criminal charges in the United States. A former "); text-decoration: none;" href="https://insidedefense.com/insider/lockheed-hires-rank" class="cm dw lp lq lr ls" target="_blank">general who helped craft U.S. Middle East policy decamped to run Lockheed Martin’s operations in Saudi Arabia. Foreign governments are hiring U.S.-trained "); text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-spying-raven-specialreport/special-report-inside-the-uaes-secret-hacking-team-of-u-s-mercenaries-idUSKCN1PO19O" class="cm dw lp lq lr ls" target="_blank">hackers and "); text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/aramroston/mercenaries-assassination-us-yemen-uae-spear-golan-dahlan" class="cm dw lp lq lr ls" target="_blank">mercenaries to target their political enemies. It’s ridiculous. Former senior national security officials shouldn’t get paid big bucks to work for foreign governments — especially when that work undermines U.S. interests. My plan would make it illegal. Expose Defense Contractor Lobbying. Defense contractors should be required to disclose the true scope of their lobbying activities — including who they’re meeting with at the DOD, what they’re lobbying about, and what (unclassified) information they’re sharing. And federal open records laws should apply to private defense contractors so the public can understand what they’re doing. In 2017, Lockheed alone received more than "); text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/in-trumps-budget-lockheed-looms-almost-as-large-as-the-state-department/2018/02/15/e7eb3aa8-11c1-11e8-9570-29c9830535e5_story.html?utm_term=.eb57847e752f" class="cm dw lp lq lr ls" target="_blank">$35 billion in taxpayer dollars from defense contracts. That’s more than the federal government spent on the entire budget for NASA. Many of these private companies are under pressure to show year over year revenue to their shareholders and investors on Wall Street. That means they are constantly pressuring the federal government for more spending — regardless of our national security needs. It’s long past time for real reform. All three of my brothers went off to join the military because, like tens of thousands of uniformed and civilian employees and officers at the Defense Department, they wanted to serve their country. We should all be grateful for that kind of service and sacrifice. If we want to demonstrate that gratitude, we can start by making sure that national security decisions are driven only by what best keeps Americans safe.
