The global community was startled to hear that President Donald Trump would withdraw US troops from Syria, and abandon the Kurds, who have been a long time ally for the United States in the Middle East. This implies that Trump has begun to carry out his outrageoug election pledge to scale down America's security commitment on the global stage. Quite importantly, Trump's America First actions go beyond Syria. Now, it has become clear that his corrosive words are not for a poker game, and he is really abandoning American hegemony, so irresponsibly.
To begin with, let me talk about geopolitical retreat from Syria. Bitter backlashes came from Democrats and even from Trump's fellow Republicans, as they are critically concerned with the geostrategic advancement of Russia and Turkey, and the resurgence of ISIS, following the power vacuum. That is partly because Syria is not an election issue ( "Why did Trump betray the Kurds? The rationales make no sense."; Washington Post; October 10, 2019). The most fundamental mistake is that Trump confuses "endless war" in the Middle East with open ended military presence to maintain the alliance network, according to Richrd Haass, President of the Council on Foreign Relations. In other words, Trump's America First pledge is based on misguided assumptions ( "The High Price of Trump's Great Betrayal"; Project Syndicate; October 17, 2019). Ironically, Trump makes the same, or even worse mistake than his Democratic predecessor did. Max Boot comments the following. In 2011, Obama rejected to intervene to stop Syria from using chemical weapons against the opposition until Assad crosses the Red Line, though Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, CIA Director David Petraeus, and Senator John McCain in those days argued for military aid to the rebels, and creation of safe zones and no-fly zones. It was simply for fear of another Iraq quagmire. But Obama failed to deter Assad from crossing the line, and reversed his Syria policy to support Kurds later. In view of this, Boot criticizes there is nothing legitimate, regarding Trump's abandonment of the Kurds,which invigorates Turkey and Russia ( "Obama's Syria policy was bad. Trump's is worse."; Washington Post; October 22, 2019).
In addition to geopolitical supremacy in the Middle East, Trump is damaging the universal legitimacy of American values. The Trump administration dismisses broadly shared understandings of Kurdish-Turkey relations among foreign policy communities. Syrian Kurds are closely tied with the PKK in Turkey. Despite communist backgrounds in the past, the PKK is regarded as a freedom fighter group like the ANC in South Africa, among Middle East democratization experts, such as Micheal Rubin at the American Enterprise Institute ( "It's time to acknowledge the PKK's evolution"; National Interest; January 25, 2019). On the other hand, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo agrees with Recep Erdoğan that the PKK was a terrorist group, and defends Turkey's incursion, from his Hazony-styled nationalist point of view ( "Turkey had 'legitimate security concern' in attacking Syrian Kurds, Pompeo says"; PBS News Hour; October 9, 2019). Therefore, the Trump administration treats Syrian Kurds bluntly, even though they helped America's war on terror a lot, which faced bitter bipartisan criticism in the Congress.
Trump's abdication of geopolitical responsibility and "quid pro quo" nationalism has led to an inevitable clash with American allies. In the Middle East, Israel realized that Trump was as reluctant as Obama to stand up against threats like Iran and so forth ( "After Trump abandons Kurds, Israel knows it can't rely on anyone"; Jerusalem Post; October 7, 2019). More importantly, the trans-Atlantic alliance was terribly destabilized. It is not just a resurgence of terrorism and the influx of refugees that terrifies Europeans, after American withdrawal from Syria. Garvan Walshe, former national and international security advisor of the British Conservative Party, comments that Trump's abandonment of the Kurds is a notice to tell Europeans that those who depend on America's security umbrella at present can choose either serve for Trump's personal interests like Ukraine's Zelensky, or act on their own, which chilled the spine of Poland, Latvia, and Lithuania ( "Kobani Today, Krakow Tomorrow"; Foreign Policy ---- Argument; October 16, 2019).
The Syrian fiasco inflicts tremendous damages beyond the Middle East and Europe. In Asia, Trump skipped the East Asian Summit, this November. He does not give consideration to strategic rivalries with China ( Twitter: Ely Ratner; October 30). Furthermore, he even suggested withdrawal of US troops from South Korea, as defense cost talks did not make progress, which upset Defense department officials ( "Pentagon denies report U.S. mulls pulling up to 4,000 troops from South Korea"; Reuters; November 21. 2019). Meanwhile, the Defense Intelligence Agency released a report to assess that ISIS would rise again in Syria in the long term, even though the US troop killed ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi successfully ( "Trump's pullout from Syria allowed ISIS to gain strength, intel agency reports"; Politico; November 19, 2019). After all, Trump has fired the adults in the room, and hurdles against implementing his America First election pledge have been removed. If he were to be reelected, it would be catastrophic for the global community. In that case, American allies and foreign policy would have to explore damage control.
