Those in insurance
field and those availing insurance coverage would well know that Marine
Insurance, the most codified form of Insurance is different from other
insurances. Here, there is no printed policy containing terms and conditions
but a schedule to which various clauses are attached is in vogue. The changing
times and dynamics of market require that the wording defining coverage need to
be changed from time to time. Presently, in Indian market, the Institute Cargo
Clauses of 1982 are still used, though 2009 version has come into existence.
Prior to introduction to such codified clauses, the policies were drafted by
the individual underwriters to suit the risks as they perceived them. The
policies would be structured to cover hazards to which the cargo would be
exposed during a specified voyage.
In 1912 the first
Institute Cargo Clauses were developed, (Institute refers to the Institute of
London Underwriters) and these were based on clauses in common use at the time.
By the 1960s, four sets of basic clauses were in common use, All Risks, W.A.
(With average), F.P.A. (Free from particular average) and the Air Cargo Clauses
(All Risks). These clauses were still required to be read in conjunction with
the SG policy form, to which they were attached. Then came the revision in 1982
which was adopted by the market effective 1983 and the present revision.
Most commercial
contracts would specify coverage under Institute Cargo Clauses (A). Though some countries have their own
versions, a very high % of coverage is represented by ICC clauses of UK i.e.,
made by Institute of London Underwriters.
The primary level coverages ICC (C) and ICC (B) are named peril
policies......... The risks covered clause under ICC (B) would read :
1 This
insurance covers, except as provided in Clauses 4, 5, 6 and 7 below,
1.2. loss of or damage to the
subject-matter Insured reasonably attributable to
1.2.1. fire
or explosion
1.2.2. vessel
or craft being stranded grounded sunk or capsized
1.2.3. overturning
or derailment of land conveyance
1.2.4. collision
or contact of vessel craft or conveyance with any external object other than
water
1.2.5. discharge
of cargo at a port of distress
1.2.6. earthquake,
volcanic eruption or lightining.
1.3. loss of or damage to the
subject-matter insured caused by
1.3.1. general
average sacrifice
1.3.2. jettison
or washing overboard
1.3.3. entry
of sea, lake or river water into vessel craft hold conveyance container liftvan
or place of storage.
1.3.4. total loss of any package lost overboard or
dropped whilst loading on to, or unloading from, vessel craft.
~ - ~ the last one
makes an interesting read : ‘total loss of any package lost
overboard......’.....
Marine Policies
cover goods in transit – from the time the goods leave the warehouse or place of
storage, continues during the ordinary course of transit and terminates upon
delivery to consignee (there are further restrictions and coverage of course is
subject to the sale contract enunciating the insurable interest) ......... in
some ports loading onto Overseas vessel (and unloading from the vessel) is done
mid-stream by lighters and here due to rough conditions, packages / bags could
fall into sea. Even in advanced Ports, packages falling into sea whilst loaded
in slings is not totally uncommon – one will be surprised to read that every
year hundreds of containers fall into sea – and are lost – mostly are not
retrieved. ICC (B) would offer
protection when cargo is thus lost (the package in its entirety) ..... here is
something unusual of a truck itself falling into sea .. at Chennai ... as
reported in Times of India.
In an unusual incident, a tipper lorry
backing up to get into a queue of vehicles waiting to take on coal from a ship
at Chennai Port fell into the sea just after midnight. The accident occurred at
the Jawahar Dock point around 12.15am. The tipper lorry driver, Arul Raj, is
thought to have fallen asleep at the wheel. Arul Raj, a 27-year-old contract
worker, who also fell into the sea with the vehicle, however, managed to escape
by opening the window of his cabin and swimming out. The other lorry drivers
and cleaners then helped him climb to safety. The lorry was later pulled out
with the help of a crane. Witnesses
later told police that Arul Raj had parked the lorry near the northern side of
Jawahar Dock where a coal-laden ship was stationed.
As a number of vehicles were waiting in
a line to load the coal, Arul Raj tried to enter the queue by reversing the
vehicle. Seeing him go close to the water, some of those in the line tried to warn
him but Arul Raj apparently ignored their caution and continued reversing and
fell in. Soon, a lot of truck drivers
and cleaners gathered at the spot where he fell in. By then, the driver had
broken the window of his cabin and jumped out into the water. After he was
pulled out, an ambulance of the 108 service was called. Arul Raj, who suffered
injuries to the hands, was sent to the Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital
from where he is expected to be discharged a day later. Arul Raj, a driver for
a transport agency in Chennai, was assigned to take on the load of coal at the
port and deliver it at a private company near Coimbatore. As no complaint was
lodged, the Harbour police said they didn't register any case. After the lorry was lifted out, the transport
agency which owns it was informed.
A month earlier another driver at
Malaysia was not so lucky. In an
accident at the Lekir Bulk Terminal in Lumut Port, the car plunged into the
sea, the driver who was trapped inside was killed. The car was later fished out of sea and
authorities are quoted as stating that they had to rely on sonar devices to
detect the vehicle as it was dark. Once
detected, scuba divers were pressed into service and the slightly crushed car
was lifted up using a crane of the jetty.
(news and photo credit : thestar.com.my)
With regards – S.
Sampathkumar.
21st
July 2014.