The Threat of Islam Extremists is Beyond the Occident

Remember the Algerian hostage crisis in In Amenas early this year. An Al Qaeda affiliate led by Mokhtar Belmokhtar killed more Japanese and Asians than Americans and Europeans working at the natural gas joint venture site. This incident is symbolic to show that Islamic extremists are enemy to anyone beyond Christians and Jews. The threat of radical Islamists is universal. In high school and college world history textbooks, the authors focus primarily on the Islam-West clash as typically seen in the Crusade. Throughout the history, Islam and the West frequently antagonized each other in the Battle of Tours, the Reconquista of Iberia, the Fall of Constantinople, and the Siege of Vienna. Furthermore, 19th century colonialism has led to the spread of anti-Western sentiments in the Islamic world.
In view of long and bitter Islam-West conflicts, it is widely believed that Middle East Muslims hate Americans and Europeans, but not Japanese and Asians. This is a sheer myth as shown in the In Amenas massacre. In the eyes of radicals like Belmokhtar, any non-Muslim outsiders are kaffir aliens. Moreover, from a literal understanding of the Koran, most of the Japanese and Asians are more pagan than Judeo-Christian Americans and Europeans, as both are not people of the Book. For example, many Japanese were brutally killed by Islamic extremists, even though they were not acting with Americans or Europeans, nor were they associated with Christianity, when they were attacked. The most noticeable case is the shooting of Japanese diplomats, Counselor to Britain Katsuhiko Oku and Third secretary to Iraq Masamori Inoue were shot dead near Tiktit, shortly after the fall of Saddam Hussein,.
For further understanding of the threat of Islamic extremist from history. Islam fought against kaffir civilizations other than the West. The most noticeable one is the destruction of Buddhist holy land in India. It is commonly understood that resurgence of Vedism as Hinduism among Indian rulers and grassroots. When Chinese (Tang) Buddhist monk Xuanzang stayed in India to study Buddhism philosophy under the reign of Emperor Harsha Vardana in the 7th century, Buddhism had been already in decline. However, it is Islamic radicals who vandalized and delivered the final blow to Indian Buddhism.
Islamic invasion to India was intensified by the Ghaznavid Empire in the 11th century, which led to Islamification of the subcontinent and iconoclastic assault to Buddhist civiilzation. The most fatal raids were the destruction of venerable insttutions of Buddhist intellect, including Nalanda University (where Xuanzang studied Buddhism philosophy and Sanskrit) in 1193 and Vikramasila University in 1203 by Muhammad Bakhtiyar Khilji during the Ghorid rule. Coincidentally, it was after 1,500 years since Gautama Siddhartha expired when the Latter Day of the Law begins, according to Buddhist theory in the early Middle Age. In this concept, the Latter Day, people respect Buddha’s teachings, but no longer follow them, which leads to the end of Buddhism and social disorder. It is the iron fist of Islam that devastated Buddhism and brought the Latter Day to the real world in India.
Strangely, unlike European knights, Buddhist kings and lords in Asia hardly thought of recapturing Siddhartha’s birthplace and other holy lands in India from Muslim seizure. This is partly because there were neither the pope of the Roman Catholic nor the Byzantine emperor of the Eastern Orthodox to urge kings and lords to organize a multinational coalition for religious cause in the Buddhist sphere. However the notion of the Latter Day of the Law spread among Buddhist nations across East Asia. The Latter Day theory had significant effects on the Buddhist thoughts.
In Japan, the impact was not just religious but political. It was widespread of anxiety to social disorder that led to the rise of samurais. War lords like Taira no Kiyomori and Minamoto no Yoritomo took over power from the emperor and aristocrats when Islamic warriors were expanding their dominions in India. Therefore, I would like to stress the point of my argument again that it is too dangerous to trivialize the threat of Islamic extremists only for Americans and Europeans, considering the above mentioned history. European launched the Crusade but Asians didn’t. That does not belittle the danger of radical Muslims.
Now, I would like to discuss the peril of Islamic radicalism in presentday context. Taliban is notorious for iconoclastic ravage to bomb the Buddhas of Bamiyan in2001. Having spent several years in Guantánamo, Taliban’s ambassador to Pakistan Abdul Salam Zaeef published a memoir “My Life with Taliban” in the United States in 2010. According to his book, Japan sent an official delegation that accompanied a Sri Lankan Buddhist group to stop Taliban from devastating the Buddhas. The Japanese delegation even said that they respect Afghans as forefathers of Buddhist civilization and requested to preserve these venerable cultural heritage.
In reply, Zaeef told them to convert to Islam if they respect Afghans (“Japan offered to hide Bamiyan statues, but Taliban asked Japan to convert to Islam instead”; Japan Today/AFP; February 27, 2010). The Japanese are too naïve to believe that they do not hate us as much as Americans and Europeans. For extremists like Taliban and Al Qaeda, kaffirs are kaffirs.
In view of such intolerance to other religion and civilization, American conservatives and Indian policymakers are extremely skeptic to the Good Talian Theory. Indians are highly alert to Pakistan’s ties with Taliban and still resented with the Mumbai attacks in 2008. But it is quite likely that their historical experience of Islamic invasion to the subcontinent has inflicted psychological impacts on their attitude to extremists. In 2010, MP (Lower House) Manish Tewari, then-Spokesman of the Indian National Congress (INC), stated clearly that he did not believe in good Taliban as two Sikhs were beheaded by them (“There is no good Taliban: Congress”; Economic Times; February 23, 2010).
Despite the request from the Obama administration, India is still concerned with giving legitimacy to Taliban if they are included in Afghan peace talks. After the meeting with Secretary of State John Kerry in Delhi this June (“India's concerns over talks with Taliban won't be overlooked”; New Indian Express; 24 June, 2013), Indian External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid said that the Singh administration would accept Taliban’s participation in Afghan peace talks as long as India’s redline is respected at he ASEAN Regional Forum in Brunei early July (In change of stance, India supports talks with Taliban;Times of India; July 3, 2013). The redline is that the only legitimate government to represent Afghan sovereignty is democratically elected Karzai, not Taliban.
However, oppositions like BJP criticize the idea of talking with terrorists (“BJP cautions US against peace talks with Taliban.”; Indian Express; July 24, 2013). Apparently, Indians are more sensitive to the danger posed by Islamic terrorists than Americans and Europeans. In his recent visit to Mumbai, Vice President Joseph Biden articulated that Taliban must cut ties with Al Qaeda, in order to ease anxieties of India. However, Lisa Curtis, Senior Research Fellow at the Heritage Foundation, comments that Biden must assure that the United States will not make a secret deal with Taliban after 2014 withdrawal from Afghanistan (“Biden seeks to assure India on Afghanistan, presses on trade” Reuters; July 24, 2013).
In view of history and presentday international politics, we must change commonly believed perception that the threat of Islamic extremism is for Americans and Europeans only.  Once I heard a Japanese TV anchorman suggested that Japanese people stay away from Americans to travel safely when they go to the Middle East. I have no doubt that Indians will laugh scornfully at such a poorly educated remark. They have historical experience in the horror of Islamic extremists, which is deeply embedded in their minds, and no less catastrophic than 911 terrorist attacks. Those religious fanatics are utterly merciless to kaffirs regardless of race and nationality. Remember In Amenas!