Exhibit 1. Memo of Russian Operatives from Wikileaks
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/fileid/1120/251
it seems that Russia's attempt to influence the 2016 election was to exacerbate the political divisions within the US and promote Trump as a presidential candidate.
It seems some people are conspicuously absent from the Mueller report. Why aren't the Russian operatives responsible for Exhibit 1 being mentioned?
I think that is prime evidence that the General Counsel's report was a witch hunt.
Let's face it, the entire thing is based upon leaked Democratic Party internal communications.
Next, it seems that the Russians wanted to use social media to turn people against Hillary Clinton.
Was that really necessary? Hillary Clinton was one of the most unpopular candidates to run: EVER!
The only candidate more unpopular was Donald Trump!
On the other hand, that seems to mean that you have to be some kind of Russian bot if you posted anything that was remotely critical of Hillary Clinton. I mean who else would dare criticize the party's chosen candidate?
Those Bernie Bros were Russian stooges as was anyone else who dared not vote for Hillary. And don't you dare to criticize her.
The reality is that there is more than enough documentation of Clinton acting like an asshole without anyone's assistance. She didn't need the Russians to make her look bad. She did a great job on her own.
So far, I have yet to see any remotely plausible reason for Clinton's loss other than the Electoral College, but some people want to go on like a bunch sore losers hoping that Trump will be impeached.
Aside: Do you think they would be happy with Pence?
Personally, I saw a lot more internal US actions that violated the concept of a free and fair election. The ironic thing was those actions came from the Democratic Party.
But who is investigating how independents who tried to reregister as Democrats were denied the opportunity to vote in closed Primaries?
And the Democratic Parties violation of its internal rules to favour Clinton over Sanders are an open secret. It's the elephant in the room about all this.
I mean the e-mails in question are internal Democratic Party Communications which have been confirmed to be authentic.
As a criminal defence attorney, I would be hammering on that one if my client were accused of this shit.