Culture Magazine

The Cultural Evolution of Deep Learning

By Bbenzon @bbenzon

Due to #NeurIPS2022 deadline few days ago, you've probably been seeing many new preprint pushing the SOTA in Deep Learning. @KordingLab & I think that understanding this success requires an evolutionary view of the deep learning field: https://t.co/OHXXafrNJe
What do you think? pic.twitter.com/FORIVsJgVO

— Artem Kaznatcheev (@kaznatcheev) May 23, 2022

Abstract of the above paper:

Deep Learning (DL) is a surprisingly successful branch of machine learning. The success of DL is usually explained by focusing analysis on a particular recent algorithm and its traits. Instead, we propose that an explanation of the success of DL must look at the population of all algorithms in the field and how they have evolved over time. We argue that cultural evolution is a useful framework to explain the success of DL. In analogy to biology, we use `development' to mean the process converting the pseudocode or text description of an algorithm into a fully trained model. This includes writing the programming code, compiling and running the program, and training the model. If all parts of the process don't align well then the resultant model will be useless (if the code runs at all!). This is a constraint. A core component of evolutionary developmental biology is the concept of deconstraints -- these are modification to the developmental process that avoid complete failure by automatically accommodating changes in other components. We suggest that many important innovations in DL, from neural networks themselves to hyperparameter optimization and AutoGrad, can be seen as developmental deconstraints. These deconstraints can be very helpful to both the particular algorithm in how it handles challenges in implementation and the overall field of DL in how easy it is for new ideas to be generated. We highlight how our perspective can both advance DL and lead to new insights for evolutionary biology. 

 


Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog