Society Magazine

Signs of Societal Decay: Mandated Coverage for Gay Infertility

Posted on the 09 April 2013 by Brutallyhonest @Ricksteroni

You and I, as taxpayers, must overcome the biological discrimination being foisted upon the gay community who desire children.

I kid you not:

In entirely unrelated news, there’s a new proposal to mandate coverage for Gay Infertility. The problem ImagesGayInfertilityis that Gay Infertility is just biology. Two men and two women are not infertile. They’re just not capable of impregnating each other. This isn’t a medical problem. It’s a mental problem.

Infertility is meant to cover natural couples who would be capable of conceiving a child if not for medical problems. Gay rights activists will predictably argue that couples in which one partner has deeper medical problems may also be covered, but that is only as part of a larger set of natural couples. Unnatural couples cannot ever have children without medical intervention. They’re not infertile. They’re biologically incompatible.

But now that we’ve decided that gay marriage is a real thing, biology be damned. Gay infertility must also be a real thing. And you must also pay for it.

...

But why stop there?

Once we’ve determined that 70-year-olds and gay men are equally entitled to infertility treatments, not to mention people paralyzed from the waist down and 3-year-olds… it’s time to extend the civil right of a medical treatment meant to help biologically compatible couples to people trying to impregnate sheep and coffee tables.

If we’re going to treat biology like a bad joke, why stop at the human species line? Why stop at biology at all.

We are losing our collective minds.

Seriously, we are.


Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog