Society Magazine

Only Superhumans Can Study Reverse ~ - Something on Prodigies

Posted on the 02 December 2024 by Sampathkumar Sampath
‘Dr. Narendranin Vinodha Vazhakku’  ( Strange Case of Dr. Narendran) was a great story by my favorite Sujatha.  Purnam Viswanathan staged it for more than 175 times.  In the drama, the highly qualified doctor  returned from abroad stands the trial for crimes of – mercy killing, planning an abortion and hastening death of a child prodigy stricken with leukemia.  Strange case, for the accused wishes to be pronounced guilty, even as his firebrand lawyer argues out for him.   It had Sujatha touch on ethical and humane issues.  Doogie Howser, M.D. was an American comedy-drama television series that ran for four seasons on ABC from Sept 1989 to July  1993, totalling 97 episodes. It starred  Neil Patrick Harris in the title role as a teenage physician who  faces the problems of being a normal teenager.   Only superhumans can study reverse ~ - something on Prodigies There are child prodigies in real life too.  Akrit Pran Jaswal (Apr 1993) is credited to have performed his first surgery at the age of seven. A couple of years ago, 13 year old Sushma Verma became the youngest science graduate from the Lucknow University and would become  the  youngest postgraduate in the country after she completes M Sc in microbiology from Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (BBAU) in 2015.  Sushma outdid her elder brother Shailendra Verma’s feat of the youngest graduate.  Shailendra was 14 when he completed BCA in 2007.  Daughter of a daily wage labourer and an illiterate mother, the girl  holds the distinction of being India’s youngest matriculate at a tender age of seven, which found her a place in the Limca Book of Records. Prodigies are rare ! ~ still – only Superman can have education  in reverse order is what Justice V Ramasubramanian pronounced recently.  Here is an interesting report from Times of India, Chennai Edition.  We follow a particular order even in the matter of wearing costumes. The only exception to this is comics' book hero Superman. People who complete educational courses in reverse order can only be compared to Superman, the Madras High court  said. “No one would have ever imagined that people may acquire a postgraduate degree first, followed by an undergraduate degree, and complete the higher secondary course to a kindergarten,“ said Justice V Ramasubramanian,  refusing to permit a law graduate to enrol and practice in courts, as he had completed his graduation course without clearing his Plus Two. The matter relates to a petition filed by G Bappudurai, who failed in one subject in Plus Two in 1999. Without clearing Class 12, he joined a bachelor's degree course under Alagappa University's distance education programme. He obtained the BA degree in history in 2010. Thereafter, he appeared for the arrear paper in Plus Two in March 2010, and cleared it.  He later joined a three year law course in Tirunelveli Government Law College in 2010-11 and completed it in 2013. Though he was issued a provisional certificate, Tamil Nadu Dr Ambedkar Law University issued a show-cause notice to him after it came to know that Bappudurai did not complete his education in the prescribed 10+2+3 format. His counsel argued that Bappudurai fulfilled the eligibility criteria in 2010-11 for joining the three-year law degree course and that the university can't question it after issuing the provisional certificate. Rejecting the argument, Justice Ramasubramanian said, “When the expression `degree' was defined in the statutes, the law makers never imagined the kind of inventions that could happen in the field of education, entitling people to acquire all qualifications in the reverse or perverse order. At the time when the expression `degree' was defined in the statute, people would have honestly believed that a student would undertake a journey from the first standard up to the school final in a sequence and thereafter undergo the entire duration of the degree course.“ Pointing out that the petitioner had not obtained his educational certificates in normal sequence, the judge said he had not fulfilled the requirement of Rule 5 of the Rules of Legal Education, 2008, and hence not entitled to use the degree for enrolment as an advocate. However, as a consolation, Justice Ramasubramanian made it clear that his degree would not go waste, and said: “If a private employer is prepared to employ him on the basis of the law degree, I do not wish to stand in the way . But, it will not entitle him to get enrolled as an advocate.” With regards – S. Sampathkumar
29th Jan 2015.

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog