data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57ecf/57ecfc067d882b335b4c7868f980d2c1131a558e" alt="Nature Communications faux pas Nature Communications faux pas"
has this figure showing the phylogenetic relationship between "contemporary human populations and Neanderthals":
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15247/15247bcaf8e521a2f8445e83a1e7e323a92bd29c" alt="Nature Communications faux pas Nature Communications faux pas"
Basically, the contemporary "out-of-Africa" individual is in a suit and a bowler hat, and the individual of "purely African ancestry" looks like a thug.
How does something like this get published in a prestigious journal nowadays?
HT @JacobPhD