What is the Rule of Net Neutrality?
“Net Neutrality” is basically a principle that deals with the equal treatment of traffic on the networks of the internet service providers. The companies like Verizon Communication Inc or Comcast Corp should neither block nor slow down the access to any content, web or website for the benefit of their personal services in comparison with their opponents. The statements of public opinions on the “Net Neutrality” concept might have the content companies provide a reliable and a faster access to the traffic. The US Federal Communications Commission is involved in evaluation the public statements until September 10th.
Neutrality Regulation:
In the year 2010, the FCC surpassed an order supporting the prohibition of the traffic blockage from the internet service providers. It acknowledged “commercially reasonable” traffic inequity but denied the promising “pay-for-priority” plans that may have let on the content companies to wage for their traffic delivery. In January, in regards with the case put forward by the Verizon, US court of appeals ruled against the FCC capably chopping down the regulations of net neutrality of the agencies. The only Internet service provider hangs in there till 2018 with the previous version of those set of rules due the situation placed on its NBC Universal acquisition. All the other hefty Internet providers have claimed their favors to an open internet.
Court Rejecting the Rules:
In the 2010 rules setting, the FCC’s behavior towards the Internet providers was similar to that of the telephone companies that are even more strictly regulated. Columbia Circuit’s US Court of Appeals ruled that type of treatment improper due to the providers of broadband actually being portrayed as the service providers with sparsely regulated information.
Fresh Plans of FCC:
Based on the guidance from the court, FCC has proposed fresh rules, which refrains the Internet providers from the blocking of the access to the users to specific set of websites or applications. These rules would need them to maintain the transparency in their network traffic management. Rules mentioned the “commercially reasonable” allowing specific web traffic and also particular “pay-for-priority” plans should be surmised illegal. The rules also considers the potential reclassification of the broadband service providers and in what ways FCC may abode the so called deals of “interconnection” that are presently beyond the reach of net neutrality rules.
Consumer Advocate’s Opposition:
Consumer’s Advocates believe that Wheeler’s proposal would lead to “fast lanes” for the companies those who are ready to pay harming the competition leaving the start ups behind. Apart from this, many established technology companies like Facebook, Google etc. may pose a great threat to the internet.
Regulation Opponent’s Say:
The argument of Verizon with FCC mentioned that the rules were accounted to the over reach of the government into the business dealings of the companies. The argument from the companies stated that the idea of reclassification would introduce an uncertainty in the prolonged regulation without denying the “pay-for-priority” deals.
