
Last year we wrote a bibliometric paper describing a new way to rank journals, which I contend is a fairer representation of relative citation-based rankings by combining existing ones (e.g., ISI, Google Scholar and Scopus) into a composite rank. So, here are the 2016 ranks for (i) 93 ecology, conservation and multidisciplinary journals, and a subset of (ii) 46 ecology journals, (iii) 21 conservation journals, just as I have done in previous years (2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008).
(i) ecology, conservation and multidisciplinary


One of the interesting things here compared to last year’s rankings is that Nature Climate Change is starting to knock at Science‘s door.
(ii) ecology journals

(iii) conservation journals
Here’s probably the most interesting list for CB.com readers:

—
CJA Bradshaw
