Sports Magazine

HABS: Events Per-minute Played and Success-rates (by Zone)

By Kicks @Chrisboucher73
This post will communicate the number of events per-minute each Montreal player has engaged in while in each zone. It will also show how many of those events occured while the player was in possession of the puck, and how many of those events were attempts to remove possession from the opposition.
In addition, every player's success-rate with possession, and while attempting to remove possession in each zone will also be displayed.
EVENTS PER-MINUTE (BY ZONE)
This graph displays the number of events per-minute of even-strength ice-time. The events are broken into zones. Each color within the graph represents a zone. The red line indicates events in the defensive-zone, while the green and yellow line represent the offensive and neutral-zones, respectively.
Among defensemen, PK Subban has engaged in the most defensive-zone events per-minute played; followed by Josh Gorges. Francis Bouillon engaged in the fewest defensive-zone events per-minute played. Bouillon also engaged in the fewest offensive-zone events per-minute, while Douglas Murray engaged in the fewest neutral-zone events. The most neutral-zone events are engaged in by PK Subban, while the most offensive-zone events are produced by Andrei Markov.
Among centres, Lars Eller engaged in the most offensive, neutral, and defensive-zone events per-minute of even-strength ice-time. David Desharnais engaged in the fewest defensive-zone events, while Ryan White engaged in substantially-fewer offensive-zone events than the Habs other 3 centremen.
Max Pacioretty engaged in the most offensive-zone events per-minute among Montreal wingers, while Brandon Prust engaged in the most neutral-zone events. Michael Bournival actually engaged in the most neutral-zone events.
Alex Galchenyuk and Daniel Briere engaged in the fewest neutral-zone events, while Briere and Bourque engaged in fewest defensive-zone events per-minute among wingers.

OFFENSIVE-ZONE
This graph breaks the events each player has engaged in within the offensive-zone into either plays with possession (offensive), or plays without possession (defensive).
Among defensemen, Subban engaged in more events with the puck on his stick in the offensive-zone than any other defenseman, while Bouillon engaged in the fewest. Murray attempted to remove possession from the opposition in the offensive-zone most-often among d-men.
Desharnais engaged in the most events in the o-zone while in possession, while White engages in the fewest. Pacioretty  produced the most puck-possession events in the o-zone among wingers; followed by Bournival and Gallagher.
Parros (SSS) engaged in the most defensive-events (forechecking) per-minute in the offensive-zone; followed by Eller, Bournival, and Pacioretty.

This graph shows each player's success-rate when attempting a play with possession in the offensive-zone. Events used in this calculation include; perimeter passes, passes to the slot, wall-dekes, open-ice dekes, and shots on net.

This graph shows each player's success-rate when attempting to remove puck-possession from the opposition in the offensive-zone. Events used in this calculation include; body-checks, stick-checks, and blocked-passes.

DEFENSIVE-ZONE
This graph breaks the events each player has engaged in within the defensive-zone into either plays with possession (offensive), or plays without possession (defensive).
Among defensemen, Subban engaged in more events with possession in the defensive-zone than any other defenseman, while Murray engaged in the fewest. Murray also attempted to remove possession from the opposition in the defensive-zone most-often among d-men.
Eller engaged in the most events in the d-zone while in possession, while Desharnais engaged in the fewest. Prust produced the most puck-possession events in the d-zone among wingers; followed by Gionta.
Eller also engaged in the most defensive-events per-minute in the defensive-zone, followed by Bournival; who leads all wingers.

This graph shows each player's success-rate when attempting a play with possession in the defensive-zone. Events used in this calculation include; d-to-d passes, outlet passes, stretch passes, open-ice dekes, wall dekes, and dump-outs.

This graph shows each player's success-rate when attempting to remove puck-possession from the opposition in the defensive-zone. Events used in this calculation include; body-checks, stick-checks, blocked-shots, and blocked-passes.

NEUTRAL-ZONE
This graph breaks the events each player has engaged in within the neutral-zone into either plays with possession (offensive), or plays without possession (defensive).
Among defensemen, Subban engaged in far more events with the possession in the neutral-zone than any other defenseman, while Murray engaged in the fewest. Markov attempted to remove possession from the opposition in the neutral-zone most-often among d-men. Subban has been the Habs least-active defensively in the neutral-zone.
Eller engaged in the most events in the n-zone while in possession, while White engaged in the fewest. Bournival  produced the most puck-possession events in the n-zone among wingers; followed by Pacioretty.
Brian Gionta and Travis Moen engaged in the most defensive-events (trapping) per-minute in the neutral-zone; followed by Desharnais, Bournival, and Pacioretty.

This graph shows each player's success-rate when attempting a play with possession in the neutral-zone. Events used in this calculation include; high/risk passes, regular passes, open-ice dekes, wall dekes, and dump-ins.

This graph shows each player's success-rate when attempting to remove puck-possession from the opposition in the neutral-zone. Events used in this calculation include; body-checks, stick-checks, and blocked-passes.


Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog