Quite paradoxically, nationalism can make the nation mediocre in the world. Currently, populist nationalism of US President Donald Trump turns out caustically divisive in domestic politics. On the global stage, it could invigorate micronationalism, and fragment the nation state and regional organizations. Eventually, that could enfeeble American allies and the United States itself. Earlier this year, former Deputy National Security Advisor Michael Anton explains Trump's foreign policy criteria as an insider of the administration ( "An insider explains the president's foreign policy."; Foreign Policy; April 20, 2019).
Apparently, Trump is not neoconservative, nor is he paleoconservative. According to Anton, his foreign policy viewpoints do not fit into any ideological categories, but his America First slogan comes from homing instinct, which is naturally embedded in human minds. It seems that Anton assumes properly on this point, because a populist like Trump do not express his ideas in sophisticated notions. For further understanding, this article explains Trump's foreign policy thorough applying the argument of an Israeli political philosopher Yoram Hazony, who is the author of "The Virture of Nationalism". Hazony did not invent the Trump phenomenon, but he provides theoretical foundations for far right populism in the West.
Hazony contrasts the notion of polis and empire in accordance with Aristotle's "Politics". A polis consists of homogeneous ethne, which means "ethnic" in English. He argues that "polis" is founded on communitarian instinct, which he calls "love of one's own", and that reinforced self-motivated patriotism among polis citizens such as Athenians and Spartans. This Anton applies his theory to legitimize Trump's America First foreign policy, "Make America Great Again". On the other hand, an empire is a heterogeneous polity of universalism. Anton mentions historical fallacy of Achaemenoid Persia, Rome, through the work of Xenophon, Machiavelli, and Montesqiue. He argues that multi-ethnic empire is so huge that it needs an extensive scale of armed forces and secret police networks to maintain the order, which makes the polity of empire repressive. Likewise, he says, current globalization and regional integration alienate the human nature to "love of one's own" ethne.
The problem is ethne can be defined broadly or narrowly, depending on preference. Alexander the Great defined it broadly, when he started the war against Persia, and his Hellenes were the whole Greeks, including Macedonians. On the other hand, micronationalists today define it narrowly. We have to bear in mind that the modern nation state is not so small and homogeneous as Greek polis, their interpretation of this word can provoke fragmentation of the nation state, and inflict negative impacts on national and global security.
Among such micronationalist movements, the most critical one is in Scotland. Regretfully, Brexit is accelerating the trend for Scottish independence. However, Scotland is a strategic zone for British national defense. The Royal Navy is critically concerned whether Faslane nuclear submarine base and shipyard in Glasgow and Rosyth will be continually available, if Scotland were to leave the United Kingdom ( "Leasing Faslane could generate £1bn a year for an independent Scotland"; UK Defence Journal; August 19, 2019 : "First Minister claims independent Scotland still eligible for Royal Navy work"; UK Defence Journal; November 22, 2019 : "Would UK naval shipbuilding continue in Scotland if it left the UK?"; UK Defence Journal; December 16, 2019). Also, Scotland is the northern front line to stop Russian intrusion from the air and the sea. Tory rightists in England are so NIMBY minded that they are excessively obsessed with the EU bureaucracy and cheap labor immigrants.
Similarly, Okinawa may rise against Japan to shed the burden of accommodating US military bases. An independent Okinawa would be a huge hurdle to implement US strategy in the Indo-Pacific region. Moreover, America is not immune from the peril of fragmentation. If Trump were to be elected for the second term, California could leave the United States. If the Western far right were to pursue Hazonian nationalism so irresponsibly, it could weaken the whole of the Western alliance, and ultimately, ruin America's national interest.
In view of this, we have to reexamine the real meaning of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's case for freedom in Hong Kong, Uyghur, and Tibet. Earlier this year, Robert Kagan of the Brookings Institution pointed out that his democracy is based on Hazonian nationalism, not Lockean liberalism, and that is not compatible with long-held Wilsonian universalism of US foreign policy ( "The strongmen strike back"; Brookings Institution; March, 2019). From this point of view, we can surmise why Pompeo attacks China, while he is tolerant of human rights abuse in Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey. It is likely that he sponsors micronationalism in China to fragment America's formidable industrial and geopolitical rival. Therefore, it is naïve to assume him reliable for Asian allies, simply because he is a China hawk. Remember, Europeans do not see him so favorably.
Quite interestingly, Anton complains in his article that multilateral frameworks in Europe like NATO and the EU deter America First foreign policy, while nothing does in Asia. Today, the clash between Hazonian nationalism of Trump and his populist followers and universal liberalism of Western élites and worldwide globalists shakes international politics.
