Literally, for centuries, Fat Cat Economists(sic) have KNOWN that for any arbitrary globalised system to GROW, most other competing systems have to SHRINK, in compensation, or 'penance' (that's a good word).This is called, one imagines, Free Market Pressure - but this is just a CUNNING LEGALESE TERM invented by the professors at the universities to that can be analogised by PRISON FOOD aka to 'mask the truth'.
Economists should BE TAUGHT that there success as Businessmen and women WILL ALWAYS BE at the expense of others. They should learn that they are LITERAL VAMPIRES sucking the life force from THE REST OF HUMANITY so that the 1% of them can enjoy 'the fruits of their labour' or rather the institutionalised financial enslavement of the 99% or more of their fellow men/women. Imagine if those clever kids who'd made it into uni were really MADE TO UNDERSTAND what negative energies their amoral 'business' brutalities would inflict upon their fathers, mothers, brothers and sisters, their very own children. What if universities made it their JOB to preach to their students the negative effects of Private Patents upon a global intelligence that should freely benefit from these global-mind innovations rather than suffer under the yolk of them. Would they really do what they 'daily' do, knowing AND UNDERSTANDING the pain and suffering IMPLICIT in their trade or 'business'?
To elucidate, we can think of the GROWTH MODEL of Modern Economic Theory as the SHAVEN-HEADED FAT BASTARD HOARDING ALL THE PRISON FOOD beneath his crooked sweaty arm in a prison canteen. He gets all his shaven-headed fat bastard cronies to ritualistically steal or cunningly re-acquire other prisoners' food and then hoards it for HIMSELF (doling out a bonus sausage (or fried mushroom) here and there), while the 90% of the prisoners who're abused by this nutritional rape look on, hungrily.
Wondering (forlornly) why their austere tummies are so achy.
This has been a day-later-or-so extension, or amendment, or buttery re-clarification of the GROWTH paragraph in my earlier HYPOTHECATION DEFINED rantorial, which scrambled predatorially into the 'attack dog' briar patch rather than staying on point and discussing the topic, GROWTH i.e. false flag economics.
