Facts Are Not a Gun Loon's Friend

Yeah, Yeah.  I see the level of intelligence you all show; repeating the same cliched phrases without knowing what they mean ("palladium of liberty" only means something which protects liberty, moron. It is a person's opinion and has been used about the militia and juries--your point?).
I note how the "pro-gun" disinformation fills the internet making it hard to find accurate information.
The best part is that policy has been crippled because money for public health studies can't fund anything which "might lead to gun control". 
Well, the public who do those surveys have something to say about that:

"My colleagues and I were doing a study on playground injuries, because they were doing some remodeling projects here, and we wanted to see if that would change the playground injury rate," Sauaia said. "When we started coding the trauma data, which includes all types of childhood injuries that turn up at these trauma centers, and we noticed the morbid pattern of gun violence-related injuries for children ... that shifted the focus of the study to document violence related to injuries involving gunshots."
The data, she said, showed a surprising number of children were being injured, many of them seriously, by guns.

No wonder you lot don't like facts.
It''s bad enough having us tell you that you are more of a danger to yourselves without having the public health data out there to back us up.
Seriously, the problem with "pro-gun" arguments (bedsides not withstanding scrutiny) is that they aren't really helpful to your side.