And another from the ever-quotable @nowviskie https://t.co/0mGmGlSBbK — Rebecca Sutton Koeser (@suttonkoeser) January 15, 2019
No, I don't think we do, though it's all to 'ready at hand' for many humanists.
One thing we should do is read John Searle on objectivity and subjectivity. Alas, that's likely to make things a bit complicated. But the issue is an important one, so we should be willing to shoulder the complexity. See, e.g., these posts:
- Meaning & texts: objectivity, subjectivity
- Subjectivity vs. Objectivity in the epistemic and ontological senses (John Searle)
- Another (strenuous) take on what went wrong with literary criticism, John Searle and Geoffrey Hartman edition
- Objectivity and Intersubjective Agreement
