Edwin Hubble - Big Bang Red Shift - Or Some New Principle of Nature

Even astronomer Edwin Hubble, who is world-famous for his proposal that red-shift of stellar light is a measure of recessional Big Bang-effect, publicly questioned his own conviction in this published statement from Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific vol:59 #349 in August 1947,

red shifts may not be due to an expanding universe.

...and collisional/gravity-based Astronomers and Atrophysicists didn't listen; still don't. One wonders what went wrong in the MICC's recent past for us to be force-fed this Big Bang nonsense on a global scale. Can't they SEE that their own telescope-confirmed evidence proves Big Bang is flawed? Or can't they 'afford' to admit it?

NB: I'm of the opinion that ALL ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATIONS will devolve to the microwave end of the spectrum over time, so the Cosmic Background Radiation evidence has no valid get-out clause...