I think the answer is yes... but... he's likely got an out:
There are five known copies of the speech in Lincoln's handwriting, each with a slightly different text, and named for the people who first received them: Nicolay, Hay, Everett, Bancroft and Bliss. Two copies apparently were written before delivering the speech; the remaining ones were produced months later for soldier benefit events. Despite widely-circulated stories to the contrary, the president did not dash off a copy aboard a train to Gettysburg. Lincoln carefully prepared his major speeches in advance; his steady, even script in every manuscript is consistent with a firm writing surface, not the notoriously bumpy Civil War-era trains. Additional versions of the speech appeared in newspapers of the era, feeding modern-day confusion about the authoritative text.
The Bliss, Everett and Bancroft copies include the words "under God". The Hay and Nicolay copies do not.
It's not clear to me from which copy Obama chose to read the Address today in the following video but what is clear is that "under God" is missing.
Are you surprised? You shouldn't be.
Anyone as deceitful, as dishonest, as deceptive and manipulative as this President and his people have been, would care little as to the inclusion of "under God" in this or any Address.
Harsh? Yes. Accurate? Absolutely.
Should you have a problem with that assertion, then you have a problem period.
A huge one.
Carry on.
