Debate Magazine

Campaigners Gear up to Save Scrubs Wood

Posted on the 24 August 2013 by Lesterjholloway @brolezholloway

scrubs woodCampaigners have launched a new petition urging London Mayor Boris Johnson to abandon plans to bulldoze an area of outstanding natural beauty.

Locals have also launched a website to save Scrubs Wood (pictured above) an area that attracts rare birds and butterflies and has a nature reserve popular with school children.

Plans by the London Mayor look set to also ruin a canal conservation zone.

Boris Johnson proposes a high-density and high-rise development which would involve flattening Scrubs Wood, a railway land green corridor along the northern border of Wormwood Scrubs open space. I blogged about the plans two days ago. 

Transport for London has included a proposal to build private homes along the Grand Union Canal right up to the waters’ edge, which appear to flout the canal conservation area.

An example of how the canal would look, taken from the TfL consultation

An example of how the canal would look, taken from the TfL consultation

The consultation document includes a picture of what the canal could look like, showing a line of six-storey housing blocks build right up to the towpath.

The canal is excluded from the ‘green links’ despite it being a conservation area, which can only be a sign that existing wildlife using the canal will not be catered for.

The plans make no mention of affordable or social housing despite the London mayor pledging to double the number of newly-built affordable properties in a year.

Scrubs Wood, which is threatened with complete destruction, is a haven for rare birds, voles, lizards and butterflies and includes a nature reserve popular with school children.

TfL’s consultation document refers to “derelict and under-used land” but in the case of Scrubs Wood it is actually a richly diverse green oasis.

TfL makes only a passing reference to wildlife but misleadingly presents it as an asset rather than part of the land that Boris intends to concrete over. That makes the consultation fatally-flawed as it presents a false picture by disguising the extent of the loss of natural habitat.

‘Urban Birder’ David Lindo, star of TV birdwatching programmes, has recorded a stunning number of rare birds on Scrubs Wood, while other nature studies have highlighted the large number of butterfly species, voles, rare flora and fauna, bats and a thriving colony of lizards.

Urban Birder David Lindo at the Scrubs

Urban Birder David Lindo at the Scrubs

Boris wants to cram 19,000 new properties into just 155 hectares making it one of the highest-density housing developments in the capital. It will make the College Park & Old Oak ward one of the most populous wards in west London despite the vast open space of Wormwood Scrubs being factored in. Tory-controlled Hammersmith & Fulham already exceeds the average population density for inner London.

The mayor’s plan to build a high-rise development comes before City Hall have had a chance to slap together an Opportunity Area Planning Framework, which is putting the cart before the horse.

Hammersmith & Fulham’s Core Plan is also silent on development opportunities in Old Oak meaning the plan is being proposed without an overarching strategic vision.  Artists impressions indicate this is a development on the scale of Canary Wharf while the inclusion of tall buildings is justified as “landmarks”.

Estimates of 90,000 jobs being “created” do not tally with the small area ear-marked for businesses. The figures simply do not add up. This can only mean that a high proportion of the 90,000 jobs will not be created at all but instead counts existing construction workers and suppliers of materials that would be involved for a short period building the project, or lumps in assumptions about increased economic activity arising from the High Speed 2 line rather than the Old Oak development itself.

Recent news reports of the £30 billion cost to the taxpayer more than doubling to £70 billion has led to politicians from all sides queuing up to question the scheme’s viability.

A brief reference in the consultation document to ‘social infrastructure’ such as schools and shops appear to be an afterthought. The plan appears to count Old Oak as a ‘town centre’ development however nearest shopping is the run-down Willesden High Street and the nearest covered shopping center is Westfield in Shepherds Bush, over three miles away and only accessible by a bus route.

By Lester Holloway @brolezholloway


Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog