Economics is
complicated, confounding and interesting
subject. Angus Deaton, a Princeton
economist, has been awarded the Nobel
Memorial Prize in Economic Science on Monday for improving the measurement of
basic economic indicators like wealth and consumption, particularly in
developing nations.Professor Deaton, a British and American citizen, is best
known among economists for his insight that learning about the specific
economic circumstances and choices of individual people, rather than relying on
typical measures of larger groups, could produce a better perspective on the
workings of the economy as a whole.
“To design economic
policy that promotes welfare and reduces poverty, we must first understand
individual consumption choices,” the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said in
a statement announcing the prize, the last of this year’s crop of Nobels. “More
than anyone else, Angus Deaton has enhanced this understanding.”
The Nobel Memorial
Prize in Economic Sciences ( or the SverigesRiksbank Prize in Economic Sciences
in Memory of Alfred Nobel), commonly referred to as the Nobel Prize in
Economics, is an award for outstanding contributions to the field of economics,
and generally regarded as the most prestigious award for that field. It is not
one of the prizes that Alfred Nobel established in his will in 1895, but
instead was established 73 years later by a donation to the foundation from
Sweden's central bank, the SverigesRiksbank, on the bank's 300th
anniversary.Winners are announced with the Nobel Prize winners, and receive the
award at the same ceremony. Laureates in the Memorial Prize in Economics are
selected by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences like the Nobel laureates in
Chemistry and Physics, but not by its Nobel Committee. It was first awarded in
1969 to the Dutch and Norwegian economists Jan Tinbergen and Ragnar Frisch,
"for having developed and applied dynamic models for the analysis of
economic processes."
Economists are
applauding the decision to recognize Edinburgh-born microeconomist Angus Deaton
for his analysis of consumption, poverty, and welfare.The problem is not so
much that there is a Nobel prize in economics, but that there are no equivalent
prizes in psychology, sociology, anthropology. Economics, this seems to say, is
not a social science but an exact one, like physics or chemistry – a
distinction that not only encourages hubris among economists but also changes
the way we think about the economy. It creates the impression that economists
are not in the business of constructing inherently imperfect theories, but of
discovering timeless truths.
As reported in US
media, in 1997 economists Myron Scholes and Robert Merton were awarded Nobel
prize for their formula on safe but lucrative trading strategy ~an year later, Long-Term Capital Management lost
$4.6bn (£3bn)in less than four months; a bailout was required to avert the
threat to the global financial system. Markets, it seemed, didn’t always behave
like scientific models.
Professor Deaton,
the new Nobel laureate has been at the
forefront of a revolution made possible by computers: the use of detailed
economic data to produce more accurate conclusions about broad economic trends.
He has worked both to improve measurement techniques and to use those tools to
pose basic questions about improving human welfare.In an interview on Monday,
Professor Deaton said he had focused on the developing world because “there’s a
real moral urgency to understanding how people behave and what we should or
might be able to do about it.”He said the circumstances of his upbringing also
played a role. “I grew up in Edinburgh,” he said. “It was a cold, messy and
miserable place to grow up and I dreamed of going to tropical, colorful, hot
countries.”
Professor Deaton is
best known for refining the tools that economists use, emphasizing the
importance of careful statistical analysis of choices by individual
households.“Suppose you wanted to understand the effect of a subsidy on rice on
the well-being of farmers,” said DaniRodrik, a professor of political economy
at Harvard. “He has produced an approach that you can actually use with
household data to trace through the effect of something like this on the
well-being of different farmers.”
Janet M. Currie, a
former student of Professor Deaton’s and now his boss as chairwoman of the
economics department at Princeton, said Professor Deaton’s work had shown the
danger of simplifications such as measuring poverty by counting how many people
live on less than $1 a day.
Professor Deaton,
69, said he was “pretty sleepy” when he got the phone call Monday morning
telling him that he had won. He said his wife answered the phone at 6:10 a.m.
and then handed it to him, telling him it was an important call from
Stockholm.“I was surprised and delighted,” he said. “It was wonderful to hear
the voices of my friends on the committee.”
In case, you feel
that it is confounding – read from the first again !!
With regards – S.
Sampathkumar
13th Oct
2015.
Collated from
various sources including : dailymail; bbc; NY Times; atlantic; Guardian