Throughout the discussions of the Talpiot Tomb, right from the first, Simcha Jacobovici, James Tabor and others involved with the "Jesus Discovery" project (website here) have talked about and publicized what they call "the museum quality replica" of ossuary 6 from Talpiot tomb B. But here's the curious thing. It's not one replica. There are two different replicas. As far as I am aware -- and I think I have read everything -- they have never admitted that they produced a second replica to replace the first. (Please correct me if I am wrong). And when one notices what changes between the two replicas, there is some cause for concern.
Here is the first replica. This one was on the first version of the Jesus Discovery website and dates back to when the site was first published in February 2012, as you can see from the archive.org capture.
Replica 1 (February 2012)
Here is the second replica, which dates back, as far as I can tell, to April 2012, and which replaced the first on the Jesus Discovery website. This is the one you see there now.
Replica 2 (April 2012)
If you think they look pretty similar, you would be right. But there are some telling signs that illustrate beyond doubt that these replicas are different. Let's take a look at them side by side:
Replica 1 (left) and Replica 2 (right)
There are several tell-tale signs. Notice how in Replica 1, there are some lines drawn inside the square shaped object to the right of the vessel / fish, whereas in Replica 2, these lines are completely absent:
Replica 1 has a drawing inside the square which Replica 2 lacks
Notice also how the top left tip of the vessel / fish is next to the pointed part of a triangle in Replica 1 but next to the flat part of a triangle in Replica 2:
Triangle border differs next to top left of vessel / fish
Similarly, notice how at the bottom left of Replica 1, the triangular shape protrudes across the border whereas in Replica 2, the triangle is neatly inside of its border:
Replica 1: triangle protrudes across the border in contrast to Replica 2
Similar observations could be repeated for other elements in the two replicas, but I am sure that you get the basic point. Now one of the reasons that this is worthy of comment is that the replica (singular) has always been called "museum quality" and its accuracy has been praised. Yet, far from this being one, accurate "museum quality" replica, it is two contrasting replicas, in which attention to detail is far from the order of the day.
It is not just the question of accuracy and representation that is at issue here, or the apparent failure to flag up the differences between the two replicas. It is that Replica 2 makes several changes that may be the result of engaging with criticisms of the project. Let me attempt to explain what I am getting at.
Replica 1 appears in all the publicity for the documentary, book and website from February to March 2012. Replica 2 first appears, again as far as I can work out, and subject to correction, on April 3 or 4 2012, in Jerusalem:
Simcha Jacobovici shows off Replica 2 in Jerusalem, 3/4 April 2013
In between the release of Replica 1 and Replica 2, there had been a lot of criticism about the project's claims including, among other things, the idea that there are drawings of little "fish in the margins". Robert Cargill demonstrated that the little oval shapes had been "inked in" so as to make them appear like fish. Now notice how the "fish in the margins" changed between the two replicas. In Replica 1, before the criticism had appeared, they were presented as fish, with very clear, long tails:
Replica 1: "fish in the margins close up" (screengrab from Steve Caruso)
In Replica 2, which appeared after the criticism had been made, these shapes resemble more closely the actual shapes on the ossuary. The tails have gone:
Replica 2: "fish in the margins" now appear more like ovals
Now, since Replica 2 appeared some time after Replica 1, I began to wonder whether there were also any changes in the way that the alleged YWNH ("Jonah") inscription appeared. Does the alleged inscription differ at all between Replicas 1 and 2? There is, indeed, a major difference in the way this appears between Replicas 1 and 2. Here it is in Replica 1:
Close up of alleged "Jonah" inscription on Replica 1
This replica appears to have been produced before the "YWNH" inscription theory had emerged. The lines really look like random lines. Notice in particular what would become the letter "nun" -- it is here completely broken, just as it was in the CGI composite photograph and all the pictures up to this point (Do the lines in the "fish" head spell out Jonah?). No one looking at this picture would for a moment think it was spelling out "Jonah".However, in Replica 2, the transformation of these lines is remarkable. Now the inscription could indeed be taken to spell out "Jonah". Notice how the "nun" is now one single, connected line. It is no longer broken. The "he" is given the appearance of stopping with one thick line forming the top of the letter, and only a thin line going on to the border. And the "yod" has a little loop on it just as it does in the "tracing" of the letters that appeared when the alleged inscription first came to light. Here's a close-up:
Close up of Replica 2, showing YWNH lettering clearly marked
Yellow tracing of the alleged letters, James Tabor's blog, April 2012
In each, the "yod" has a loop, the "nun" is unbroken and the top line of the "he" does not extend all the way to the border.I don't know what to make of all this, but I thought in the interests of analyzing Talpiot Tomb B, and the claims made by those involved with the "Jesus Discovery" project, it would be useful to lay out what I have found by analyzing the two contrasting replicas, and to see if others also see what I am seeing. Why is it that the "fish in the margins" are recrafted in between Replicas 1 and 2? Why is it that the "YWNH" inscription suddenly becomes clear only in Replica 2?
It may be worth adding that the replica shown to Prof. Puech in the video released last week is clearly Replica 2, which has a version of the "YWNH" inscription that we see above, and not the ambiguous representation of Replica 1.
