Debate Magazine

"A Cost Effective Solution to the Nation's Ongoing Housing Crisis". Not.

Posted on the 13 October 2017 by Markwadsworth @Mark_Wadsworth

More glorious nonsense from The Daily Mail:
This stunning tiny 28-foot-long [mobile] house could be a solution to the housing crisis using a space-saving design without losing any home comforts...
Those 'tiny homes' (as beautiful as they are) require a fair bit of land, maybe 50 sq yards. They're only 'cheap' if you buy or rent a bit of land in the middle of nowhere. Try buying or renting 50 sq yards of land where housing is expensive and you are back to square one.
A block of flats with several storeys only uses ten or twenty square yards of land per flat, ergo they are cheaper than 'tiny homes', despite being a lot bigger, once you factor in the price you have to pay for the land.
But that doesn't help people wanting to rent or buy a flat. If you build higher, that doesn't reduce the selling price/rental value of the flats, it just increases the price payable for the land.
Rinse and repeat.

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog