Please keep in mind that this is only a one-game scouting report and should not be used to determine anything more than the player's performance in this particular game. That said, top-ranked players in last year's draft were producing risk/reward ratings between 1.90 and 2.30, and overall grades in the high 70's and low 80's.
OVERALL GRADE
Grigorenko produced a below-average overall grade of 63. He struggled in the defensive-zone, and while on the powerplay. His events per-minute played were also quite low. This could be explained by the quality of opposition, and also by Grigorenko's perimeter play during the game scouted.
25
WINS 44 WINS
EVENTS 70 EVENTS
GRADE 63 GRADE
PLAYER 25
OVERALL RISK/REWARD RATING
Grigorenko produced a below-average overall risk/reward of 0.86, and an overall ratio of only 1.62 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. His play on the powerplay substantially hurt his overall rating; particularly his inability to complete some simple, short passes during the game scouted. Most of Grigorenko's events during the game occurred in the neutral-zone.
25
POS 42 POS
NEG 26 NEG
RATIO 1.62 RATIO
MIN/G 18.55 MIN/G
25
MINUTES 19 MINUTES
POS/MIN 2.26 POS/MIN
NEG/MIN 1.40 NEG/MIN
25
EVENTS/ MIN 3.67 EVENTS/ MIN
RISK/REWARD 0.86 RISK/REWARD
25
OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING
Grigorenko's even-strength offensive-zone risk/reward rating was also below-average, as was his o-zone ratio of 1.67 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won only 1 of 3 offensive-zone puck-battles, recovered 2 loose-pucks, and completed 8 of 9 pass-attempts. He was successful with 2 of his 4 attempts to beat opposition players 1on1 (deke), while 1 of his 2 attempted shots made it through to the net.
25
OZ POS 15 OZ POS
OZ NEG 9 OZ NEG
GAMES 1.67 GAMES
MIN/G 14.8 MIN/G
25
MINUTES 25 MINUTES
POS/MIN 0.61 POS/MIN
NEG/MIN 0.36 NEG/MIN
25
EVENTS/ MIN 0.97 EVENTS/ MIN
RISK/REWARD 0.24 RISK/REWARD
25
DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING
Grigorenko did not produce above-average numbers in the defensive-zone. His defensive-zone risk/reward rating was only 0.14, while his d-zone ratio of 1.33 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play was equally below-average. He lost 1 of 3 d-zone puck-battles, and completed 2 of 3 defensive-zone pass-attempts. He blocked 1 shot, and intercepted 2 opposition passes.
25
DZ POS 8 DZ POS
DZ NEG 6 DZ NEG
ratio 1.33 ratio
MIN/G 14.8 MIN/G
25
MINUTES 15 MINUTES
POS/MIN 0.54 POS/MIN
NEG/MIN 0.41 NEG/MIN
25
EVENTS/ MIN 0.95 EVENTS/ MIN
RISK/REWARD 0.14 RISK/REWARD
25
NEUTRAL-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING
Grigorenko's best numbers occurred in the neutral-zone. He produced an above-average neutral-zone risk/reward rating of 0.47, and a solid n-zone ratio of 2.40 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He lost both his neutral-zone puck-battles, but recovered 4 loose-pucks. He completed 3 of 4 neutral-zone pass-attempts, and was successful with 1 of his 2 attempts to dump the puck deep into the offensive-zone.
25
NZ POS 12 NZ POS
NZ NEG 5 NZ NEG
ratio 2.40 ratio
MIN/G 14.8 MIN/G
25
MINUTES 15 MINUTES
POS/MIN 0.81 POS/MIN
NEG/MIN 0.34 NEG/MIN
25
EV/ MIN 1.15 EV/ MIN
RISK/REWARD 0.47RISK/REWARD
25
POWERPLAY RISK/REWARD RATING
Grigorenko struggled on the powerplay during the game; producing a powerplay risk/reward rating of 0.00, and a PP ratio of 1 successful play for every 1 unsuccessful play. He completed only 2 of 5 offensive-zone passes while on the powerplay, and only 1 of 3 neutral-zone passes on the powerplay.
25
POS 6 POS
NEG 6 NEG
RATIO 1.00 RATIO
MIN/G 3.25 MIN/G
25
MINUTES 3 MINUTES
POS/MIN 1.85 POS/MIN
NEG/MIN 1.85 NEG/MIN
25
EVENTS/ MIN 3.69 EVENTS/ MIN
RISK/REWARD 0.00 RISK/REWARD
25
